Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35441391›Full record

Observational studyAustralian occupational therapy journal2022

Effectiveness of sensory modulation for people with schizophrenia: A multisite quantitative prospective cohort study.

Tawanda Machingura, David Shum, Chris Lloyd, Karen Murphy, Evelyne Rathbone, Heather Green

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tawanda MachinguraFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-7572
David ShumHong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-9262
Chris LloydSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Karen MurphySchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0014-7665
Evelyne RathboneFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Heather GreenSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-4076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent research evidence suggests that people with schizophrenia have sensory processing difficulties. Sensory modulation has growing evidence for use in this population. This study aimed to evaluate the extent to which health, social, cognitive, and occupational functioning outcomes were impacted by sensory modulation interventions for people with schizophrenia.

methodsA prospective observational cohort study using a waitlist control design was used in two large hospital and health services in Queensland, Australia. The study recruited patients who used sensory modulation (n = 30) across the two hospitals and those who did not use sensory modulation interventions as a control (n = 11). Results were analysed using a series of planned comparisons including independent and paired t-tests, and mixed ANOVA was used whenever statistically indicated. The analysed measures were pre- and post-intervention scores.

resultsThis study found no statically significant differences between the control and intervention groups at both pre- and post-intervention. However, analysis of results from within the intervention group showed statistically significant improvements between pre- and post-test scores on distress, occupational functioning, and health and social functioning but not on sensory processing and global cognitive processing. Further analysis of results from this study, compared with those from an earlier study on the general population showed significant differences in Low Registration and Sensation Avoiding, as measured by the Adult/Adolescent Sensory Profile, between participants with schizophrenia and those without schizophrenia.

conclusionThis study provides evidence to suggest that sensory modulation interventions can be complementary to standard care when utilised appropriately in clinical settings. Findings also suggest that the sensory profile of people with schizophrenia is different to that of the general population and this may have clinical implications. Further longitudinal research is needed with larger and randomised samples, using more targeted measures to better explore effectiveness of sensory modulation interventions.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapySchizophreniaAdolescentAdultAustraliaHumansProspective StudiesQueenslandmental healthoccupational therapypsychosocial interventionquantitative evaluationschizophreniasensory disorders

Identifiers

PMID35441391
PMCPMC9544468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.