Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35441345›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage therapy for recurrent esophagogastric cancer after multimodal treatment.

Leonidas Apostolidis, Kristin Lang, Leila Sisic, Elena Busch, Aysel Ahadova, Ramona Wullenkord, Henrik Nienhüser, Adrian Billeter, Beat Müller-Stich, Matthias Kloor and 2 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonidas ApostolidisNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristin LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Leila SisicDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elena BuschNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aysel AhadovaDepartment of Applied Tumor Biology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Ramona WullenkordNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Henrik NienhüserDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Adrian BilleterDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias KloorDepartment of Applied Tumor Biology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk JaegerNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg Martin HaagNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. GeorgMartin.Haag@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-9968
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerioperative systemic treatment has significantly improved the outcome in locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. However, still the majority of patients relapse and die. Data on the optimal treatment after relapse are limited, and clinical and biological prognostic factors are lacking.

methodsPatients with a relapse after neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment and surgery for esophagogastric cancer were analyzed using a prospective database. Applied treatment regimens, clinical prognostic factors and biomarkers were analyzed.

resultsOf 246 patients 119 relapsed. Among patients with a relapse event, those with an early relapse (< 6 months) had an inferior overall survival (OS 6.3 vs. 13.8 months, p < 0.001) after relapse than those with a late relapse (> 6 months). OS after relapse was longer in patients with a microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumor. Systemic treatment was initiated in 87 patients (73% of relapsed pat.); among those OS from the start of first-line treatment was inferior in patients with an early relapse with 6.9 vs. 10.0 months (p = 0.037). In 27 patients (23% of relapsed pat.), local therapy (irradiation or surgical intervention) was performed due to oligometastatic relapse, resulting in a prolonged OS in comparison to patients without local therapy (median OS 35.2 months vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic benefit of the MSI status and a local intervention.

conclusionPatients relapsing after multimodal treatment have a heterogeneous prognosis depending on the relapse-free interval (if systemic treatment applied), extent of metastatic disease as well as MSI status. The benefit of additional local intervention after relapse should be addressed in a randomized trial.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeEsophagogastric cancerMSIPerioperative treatmentRelapseSalvage treatment

Identifiers

PMID35441345
PMCPMC10020279
OpenAlexW4224261211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read160
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.