ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2022
Factors that Impact Day-to-Day Esophageal Acid Reflux Variability and Its Diagnostic Significance for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Diagnostic Testing and Clinical Approach Based on the San Diego Consensus.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Rethinking Long-Term PPI Therapy in GERD: A Narrative Review from a Microbial Ecology Perspective Beyond Acid Suppression.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Changes in esophageal contractile and barrier function in lung transplant recipients.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025Article
- Reflux Testing: Wireless pH, Impedance-pH, and Mucosal Impedance.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Gut microbial ecology and exposome of a healthy Pakistani cohort.Gut pathogens · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease affecting a significant number of adults both globally and in the USA. GERD is clinically diagnosed based on patient-reported symptoms, and the gold standard for diagnosis is ambulatory reflux monitoring, a tool particularly utilized in the common scenario of non-response to therapy or atypical features. Over the past 20 years, there has been a shift toward extending the duration of reflux monitoring, initially from 24 to 48 h and more recently to 96 h, primarily based on a demonstrated increase in diagnostic yield. Further, multiple studies demonstrate clinically relevant variability in day-to-day acid exposure levels in nearly 30% of ambulatory reflux monitoring studies. For these reasons, an ongoing clinical dilemma relates to the optimal activities patients should engage in during prolonged reflux monitoring. Thus, the aims of this review are to detail what is known about variability in daily acid exposure, discuss factors that are known to influence this day-to-day variability (i.e., sleep patterns, dietary/eating habits, stress, exercise, and medications), and finally provide suggestions for patient education and general GERD management to reduce variation in esophageal acid exposure levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.