ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2022
Intra-operative wearable visualization in spine surgery: past, present, and future.
Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State-of-the-Art of Non-Radiative, Non-Visual Spine Sensing with a Focus on Sensing Forces, Vibrations and Bioelectrical Properties: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Accuracy of a high-resolution augmented reality (AR) guidance system with novel 3D stereoscopic targeting for spinal surgery.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Endoscope-assisted prone lateral retropleural 360° reconstruction of thoracic pathological fracture in metastatic melanoma: a case report and technical note.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Exoscope-assisted spine surgery: Insights from orthopedic and neurosurgical teams through a survey.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Emerging uses of 5-aminolevulinic-acid-induced protoporphyrin IX in medicine: a review of multifaceted, ubiquitous, molecular diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic opportunities.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Review
- Advances and Challenges of Endoscopic Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The evolution of surgical hip dislocation utilization and indications over the past two decades: a scoping review.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in Trauma and Orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The history of modern surgery has run parallel to the invention and development of intra-operative visualization techniques. The first operating room, built in 1804 at Pennsylvania Hospital, demonstrates this principle: illumination of the surgical field by the Sun through an overhead skylight allowed surgeries to proceed even prior to the invention of anesthesia or sterile technique. Surgeries were restricted to begin around when the Sun was at its zenith; without adequate light from the Sun and skylight, surgeons were unable to achieve adequate visualization. In the years since, new visualization instruments have expanded the scope and success of surgical intervention. Spine surgery in particular has benefited greatly from improved visualization technologies, due to the complex and intricate nervous, vascular and musculoskeletal structures that are closely intertwined which surgeons must manipulate. Over time, new technologies have also advanced to take up smaller footprints, leading to the rise of wearable tools that surgeons don intra-operatively to better visualize the surgical field. As surgical techniques shift to more minimally invasive methods, reliable, fidelitous, and ergonomic wearables are of growing importance. Here, we discuss the past and present of wearable visualization tools, from the first surgical loupes to cutting-edge augmented reality (AR) goggles, and comment on how emerging innovations will continue to revolutionize spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.