ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: CARE Trial 5-Year Outcomes Data for More Than 9500 Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Essence Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared With Other Products in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Single-Institution Study.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Minimal-access Nipple-sparing Mastectomy With Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Clinical safety and breast symmetry after injectable acellular dermal fibers reconstruction: an MR-based volumetric study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Retrospective study on the magnetic resonance imaging integration rate of acellular dermal matrix and complications after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- AlloDerm Versus Cortiva: A Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Host Biologic Response to Acellular Dermal Matrices of Human and Porcine Origin.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Assisted Breast Reconstruction With Biosynthetic Mesh and Implants: A Pilot Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh (GalaFlex®) in aesthetic breast surgery: A comprehensive systematic review.JPRAS open · 2025Review
- AlloDerm® versus Cortiva® in implant-based breast reconstruction: framework for a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and economic outcomes.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Collagen Remodeling of Strattice™ Firm in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Abdominal Wall Repair.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biologic Response With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Decellularized porcine dermal hydrogel enhances implant-based wound healing in the setting of irradiation.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Handling and Associated Material Properties of Porcine and Human Acellular Dermal Matrices.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Performance of Human and Porcine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Long-term Clinicaland Histologic Evaluation.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2024Article
- A Long-term Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Risk-reducing Mastectomy.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Article
- Reinforcement of a Subcutaneous Pocket for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Insertion Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have assessed long-term complications in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction with use of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM). This study compared outcomes over 5 years in women undergoing breast reconstruction procedures with and without ADM. Methods: Complications data in patients enrolled in the prospective Continued Access Reconstruction/Revision Expansion trial were segregated by use of ADM versus no ADM in patients undergoing primary breast reconstruction or revision-reconstruction. Continued Access Reconstruction/Revision Expansion trial evaluated long-term safety and effectiveness of shaped, textured, silicone implants. Results: Of the 9502 women, 257 had primary (n = 160) or revision-reconstruction ( Conclusion: These long-term data suggest that the use of ADM in breast reconstruction procedures may provide a benefit in reducing complications, such as capsular contracture, and may sustain low rates of seroma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.