Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440998›Full record

ReviewChemical science2022

Mechanically interlocked molecular handcuffs.

Nicholas Pearce, Marysia Tarnowska, Nathan J Andersen, Alexander Wahrhaftig-Lewis, Ben S Pilgrim, Neil R Champness

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas PearceSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK n.champness@bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-9577
Marysia TarnowskaSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK ben.pilgrim@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-7892
Nathan J AndersenSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK ben.pilgrim@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-4932
Alexander Wahrhaftig-LewisSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK n.champness@bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-9914
Ben S PilgrimSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD UK ben.pilgrim@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-3327
Neil R ChampnessSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK n.champness@bham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2970-1487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of mechanically interlocked molecules that employ a handcuff component are reviewed. The variety of rotaxane and catenane structures that use the handcuff motif to interlock different components are discussed and a new nomenclature, distilling diverse terminologies to a single approach, is proposed. By unifying the interpretation of this class of molecules we identify new opportunities for employing this structural unit for new architectures.

Identifiers

PMID35440998
PMCPMC8985514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.