Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440971›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2021

Pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds.

Yuexin Wang, Yining Guo, Jiajia Wang, Ziyuan Liu, Xuemin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuexin WangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yining GuoPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiajia WangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ziyuan LiuPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuemin LiPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds and the influence of different luminance environments, 28 participants with normal or corrected-to-normal vision were included. The participants were required to track moving optotypes horizontally, and their pupils were recorded on video with an infrared camera. Stimuli of different speeds from 10 to 60 degree per seconds were presented in low (0.01 cd/m2) and moderate (30 cd/m2) luminance environments. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the motion stimuli induced pupil dilation in a speed-dependent pattern. The pupil dilation increased as the speed increased, and the pupil dilation gradually increased, then reached saturation. Experiment 2 showed that a stimulus targeting the rod- or cone-mediated pathway could induce pupil dilation in a similar speed-dependent pattern. The absolute but not relative pupil dilation in the cone paradigm was significantly larger than that in the rod paradigm. As the speed increased, the pupil dilation in the cone paradigm reached saturation at speed slower than the rod paradigm. Motion stimuli induced pupil dilation in a speed-dependent pattern, and as the motion speed increased, the pupil dilation gradually increased and reached saturation. The speed required to reach saturation in the cone paradigm was slower than in the rod paradigm.

Indexed as

eye movementeye trackingMotion perceptionphotoreceptorpupillary responsesaccadessmooth pursuit

Identifiers

PMID35440971
PMCPMC9013523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.