ArticleJournal of eye movement research2021
Pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Syntonic phototherapy versus part time occlusion for treatment of refractive amblyopia.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Article
- Selecting the Appropriate Speed for Rotational Elements in Human-Machine Interfaces: A Quantitative Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2024Article
- An Illusory Motion in Stationary Stimuli Alters Their Perceived Duration.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The impact of different corneal refractive surgeries on binocular dynamic visual acuity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the pupillary response to moving stimuli of different speeds and the influence of different luminance environments, 28 participants with normal or corrected-to-normal vision were included. The participants were required to track moving optotypes horizontally, and their pupils were recorded on video with an infrared camera. Stimuli of different speeds from 10 to 60 degree per seconds were presented in low (0.01 cd/m2) and moderate (30 cd/m2) luminance environments. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the motion stimuli induced pupil dilation in a speed-dependent pattern. The pupil dilation increased as the speed increased, and the pupil dilation gradually increased, then reached saturation. Experiment 2 showed that a stimulus targeting the rod- or cone-mediated pathway could induce pupil dilation in a similar speed-dependent pattern. The absolute but not relative pupil dilation in the cone paradigm was significantly larger than that in the rod paradigm. As the speed increased, the pupil dilation in the cone paradigm reached saturation at speed slower than the rod paradigm. Motion stimuli induced pupil dilation in a speed-dependent pattern, and as the motion speed increased, the pupil dilation gradually increased and reached saturation. The speed required to reach saturation in the cone paradigm was slower than in the rod paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.