Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440961›Full record

ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2022

Development, validity and reliability of instrument to evaluate implementation fidelity of the Family Doctor Concept (FDC) programme in public primary care clinics in Malaysia.

Muhammad Alimin Mat Reffien, Ismail Aniza, Saperi Sulong, Tengku Putri Zaharah Tengku Bahanuddin, Noridah Mohd Salleh, Nazrila Hairizan Nasir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Alimin Mat ReffienMBBS, MPH, MBA, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti, Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
Ismail AnizaMD, MPH, PhD, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia, Email: aniza@ppukm.ukm.edu.my.
Saperi SulongMD, PhD, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti, Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
Tengku Putri Zaharah Tengku BahanuddinMD, MPH, Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Noridah Mohd SallehMBBS, MPH, Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Nazrila Hairizan NasirMD, M. Family Medicine, Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Family Doctor Concept (FDC) programme was introduced to public primary care clinics in late 2013 as part of the reform agenda in the primary healthcare delivery system. The study aimed to develop a validated and reliable instrument to evaluate the FDC implementation fidelity in primary care clinics. Methods: The instrument, which adapted the concept of patient-centred care (PCC), resulted from a series of expert discussions, a literature search, an FDC guideline, and a review of meeting minutes. A 2-step process was conducted with experts to achieve content and face validity. Consequently, the instrument was piloted in 5 public primary care clinics in Selangor involving 8 trained raters. Inter-rater reliability was estimated using intraclass correlation (ICC), while internal consistency was measured using Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). Results: The final instrument comprises 3 sections (instructions, clinic's characteristics and assessment items), with Section 3 containing 15 items divided into four components - population registration, formation of a primary care team, integrated treatment, and monitoring and evaluation. The ICC for total score was excellent, 0.981, while the ICCs of the individual component scores were good to excellent (population registration: 0.937, formation of primary care team: 0.742, integrated treatment: 0.996, and monitoring and evaluation: 0.996). The value of KR-20 was 0.615, which was considered adequate. Conclusion: The instrument developed was found to be valid in terms of face and content validity and reliable in measuring the fidelity of FDC implementation with excellent inter-rater reliability.

Indexed as

family doctorFidelityprimary carereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35440961
PMCPMC9004433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.