ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
The Use of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology in the Performance Appraisal Management of Innovation Capability of University Scientific Research Team.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: The Use of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology in the Performance Appraisal Management of Innovation Capability of University Scientific Research Team.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-26Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to speed up the progress of scientific research projects in colleges and universities, continuously improve the innovation ability of scientific research teams in colleges and universities, and optimize the current management methods of performance appraisal of college innovation ability. Firstly, the needs of the innovation performance evaluation system are analyzed, and the corresponding innovation performance evaluation index system of scientific research team is constructed. Secondly, the Internet of Things (IoT) combines the Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) to build an innovation capability performance appraisal management terminal. Thirdly, the lightweight deep network has been built into the innovation ability performance assessment management network of university scientific research teams, which relates to the innovation performance assessment index system of scientific research teams. Finally, the system performance is tested. The results show that the proposed method has different degrees of compression for MobileNet, which can significantly reduce the network computation and retain the original recognition ability. Models whose Floating-Point Operations (FLOPs) are reduced by 70% to 90% have 3.6 to 14.3 times fewer parameters. Under different pruning rates, the proposed model has higher model compression rate and recognition accuracy than other models. The results also show that the output of the results is closely related to the interests of the research team. The academic influence score of Team 1 is 0.17, which is the highest among the six groups in this experimental study, indicating that Team 1 has the most significant academic influence. These results provide certain data support and method reference for evaluating the innovation ability of scientific research teams in colleges and universities and contribute to the comprehensive development of efficient scientific research teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.