ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2022
Evaluation of Physicians' Electronic Health Records Experience Using Actual and Perceived Measures.
Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- User Experiences of Electronic Controlled Substance Surveillance Among Health Care Professionals in a Large Academic Hospital: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Observer: creation of a novel multimodal dataset for outpatient care research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Observer: Creation of a Novel Multimodal Dataset for Outpatient Care Research.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Investigating Information Visualization to Combat Information Overload in Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Information Prioritization and Reading Patterns in Electronic Health Record Nursing Summaries: An Eye-Tracking Case Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Impact of Electronic Health Record Use on Cognitive Load and Burnout Among Clinicians: Narrative Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Inadequate electronic health record (EHR) interface design hinders the physician-EHR experience, which may lead to increase physician frustration and fatigue levels. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the physician EHR experience by evaluating the congruency between actual and perceived measures among physicians with different EHR expertise and utilization levels. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional EHR usability study of intensive care unit (ICU) physicians at a major Southeastern medical center. We used eye-tracking glasses to measure provider EHR-related fatigue and three surveys to measure the perceived EHR experience. Results: Of the 25 ICU physicians, 11 were residents, nine were fellows, and five were attending physicians. No significant differences were found between actual fatigue levels and their perceived EHR usability (p=0.159), workload (p=0.753), and satisfaction (p=0.773). Conclusion: We found that there was low congruency between physicians' EHR-related fatigue and the perceived ratings for usability, satisfaction, and workload, which suggests using actual and perceived measures for a comprehensive assessment of the user experience. EHR-related fatigue may not be instantly felt by some physicians, hence the similar rating of perceived EHR experience among physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35440931PMC9013225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.