Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440874›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

A Predictive Model for Qualitative Evaluation of PG-SGA in Tumor Patients Through Machine Learning.

Xiangliang Liu, Yuguang Li, Wei Ji, Kaiwen Zheng, Jin Lu, Yixin Zhao, Wenxin Zhang, Mingyang Liu, Jiuwei Cui, Wei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiangliang Liu *Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Yuguang Li *College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Wei Ji *Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Kaiwen ZhengCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9801-4897
Jin LuCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Yixin ZhaoCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Wenxin ZhangDepartment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Mingyang LiuCollege of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Jiuwei CuiCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Wei LiCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) was a nutritional status assessment technique specifically tailored for patients with oncology. The goal of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) prediction model for predicting PG-SGA categorization of patients with tumor. Methods: From 2014 to 2020, patients at the First Hospital of Jilin University performed laboratory testing, bioelectrical impedance, physical measures, and the PG-SGA scale. A total of 8230 patients were involved in the study. Patients with missing or partial data were removed, leaving 7287 patients, of which 3743 were males and 3544 were females. ML was used to design a clinical prediction model for PG-SGA categories. Results: Through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and the correlation matrix, 135 variables were screened and 6 variables were retained; ML was performed among the remaining variables. The accuracy of neural network prediction models was 70.3% and 70.4% for males and females in the training cohort, respectively, and 74.4% and 73.2% for males and females in the validation cohort, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of males was 0.87 for PG-SGA scores "0-3", 0.70 for PG-SGA scores "4-8" and 0.74 for PG-SGA scores ">8". As for females, the AUC was 0.85 for PG-SGA scores "0-3", 0.65 for PG-SGA scores "4-8" and 0.76 for PG-SGA scores ">8". The results of confusion matrix showed that the models were of good predictive validity. The prediction model was nearly 90% accurate for predictions that do not require nutritional support. Conclusion: We demonstrated that neural network learning is the best clinical prediction model using ML. The model can work as a prediction for the PG-SGA classification of patients with cancer and can be promoted further in the clinic.

Indexed as

machine learningnutritional assessmentPG-SGA

Identifiers

PMID35440874
PMCPMC9013417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.