Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440873›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2022

Ribociclib in the Treatment of Hormone-Receptor Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced and Early Breast Cancer: Overview of Clinical Data and Patients Selection.

Maria Chiara Parati, Rebecca Pedersini, Gianluca Perego, Roberto Reduzzi, Tommaso Savio, Mary Cabiddu, Karen Borgonovo, Mara Ghilardi, Andrea Luciani, Fausto Petrelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Cardiac safety of ribociclib evaluated with 24-hour rhythm Holter electrocardiogram.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Chiara ParatiOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Rebecca PedersiniBreast Unit-Medical Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Gianluca PeregoPharmacy Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4309-4946
Roberto ReduzziBreast Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Tommaso SavioBreast Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Mary CabidduOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Karen BorgonovoOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Mara GhilardiOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, Medical Science Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-4486
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), combinations of an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) have demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to standard single-agent hormone therapy alone as first-line therapy for de novo metastatic disease or relapse during or after adjuvant therapy and no previous therapies in an advanced setting. We here reviewed clinical data about ribociclib in advanced and early BC. Also, we shed light on patient selection and special settings in which medical oncologists urgently await an advance in treatment. Ribociclib was FDA-approved in combination with letrozole based on a Phase III study in which 668 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic BC were treated with first-line letrozole with or without ribociclib. For patients with metastatic disease at presentation or after a course of AIs, the results of the MONALEESA-3 trial suggest ribociclib's efficacy in combination with fulvestrant, and this combination is FDA-approved for initial- and subsequent-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC. In adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors may be useful to boost outcomes in high-risk patients with HR+ BC, but data contrast with those of a phase III study, which produced positive results. New combinations are being explored in upfront disease (neoadjuvant) or in association with other targeted agents in metastatic disease. Compared to other CDK 4/6 available, ribociclib has a higher incidence of liver function test abnormalities than the other agents and can cause QTc prolongation, and therefore may be prudently avoided in patients with cardiac morbidities or other risk factors for QTc prolongation (drugs, interactions). In these cases, different agents (palbociclib or abemaciclib) may be used. In conclusion, ribociclib with letrozole or with fulvestrant is effective for the entire spectrum of patients with HR+ BC in the advanced setting. Ribociclib has all the characteristics of an innovative drug able to change the clinical practice and most BC patients' prognoses.

Indexed as

breast cancerCDK 4/6 inhibitorsreviewribociclib

Identifiers

PMID35440873
PMCPMC9013420
OpenAlexW4223442080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.