Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

First computational design using lambda-superstrings and in vivo validation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Luis Martínez, Iker Malaina, David Salcines-Cuevas, Héctor Terán-Navarro, Andrea Zeoli, Santos Alonso, Ildefonso M De la Fuente, Elena Gonzalez-Lopez, J Gonzalo Ocejo-Vinyals, Mónica Gozalo-Margüello and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luis Martínez *Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 48940, Leioa, Spain. luis.martinez@ehu.eus.
Iker MalainaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 48940, Leioa, Spain.
David Salcines-CuevasInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39011, Santander, Spain.
Héctor Terán-NavarroInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39011, Santander, Spain.
Andrea ZeoliInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39011, Santander, Spain.
Santos AlonsoDepartment of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 48940, Leioa, Spain.
Ildefonso M De la FuenteDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 48940, Leioa, Spain.
Elena Gonzalez-LopezServicio de Inmunología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008, Santander, Spain.
J Gonzalo Ocejo-VinyalsServicio de Inmunología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008, Santander, Spain.
Mónica Gozalo-MargüelloServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008, Santander, Spain.
Jorge Calvo-MontesInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39011, Santander, Spain.
Carmen Alvarez-Dominguez *Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39011, Santander, Spain. carmen.alvarezd@scsalud.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the greatest threat to global health at the present time, and considerable public and private effort is being devoted to fighting this recently emerged disease. Despite the undoubted advances in the development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19, uncertainty remains about their future efficacy and the duration of the immunity induced. It is therefore prudent to continue designing and testing vaccines against this pathogen. In this article we computationally designed two candidate vaccines, one monopeptide and one multipeptide, using a technique involving optimizing lambda-superstrings, which was introduced and developed by our research group. We tested the monopeptide vaccine, thus establishing a proof of concept for the validity of the technique. We synthesized a peptide of 22 amino acids in length, corresponding to one of the candidate vaccines, and prepared a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine vector loaded with the 22 amino acids SARS-CoV-2 peptide (positions 50-71) contained in the NTD domain (DC-CoVPSA) of the Spike protein. Next, we tested the immunogenicity, the type of immune response elicited, and the cytokine profile induced by the vaccine, using a non-related bacterial peptide as negative control. Our results indicated that the CoVPSA peptide of the Spike protein elicits noticeable immunogenicity in vivo using a DC vaccine vector and remarkable cellular and humoral immune responses. This DC vaccine vector loaded with the NTD peptide of the Spike protein elicited a predominant Th1-Th17 cytokine profile, indicative of an effective anti-viral response. Finally, we performed a proof of concept experiment in humans that included the following groups: asymptomatic non-active COVID-19 patients, vaccinated volunteers, and control donors that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The positive control was the current receptor binding domain epitope of COVID-19 RNA-vaccines. We successfully developed a vaccine candidate technique involving optimizing lambda-superstrings and provided proof of concept in human subjects. We conclude that it is a valid method to decipher the best epitopes of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to prepare peptide-based vaccines for different vector platforms, including DC vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAmino AcidsCytokinesEpitopesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SubunitAmino AcidsCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesEpitopesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID35440789
PMCPMC9016385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.