Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440716›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2022

Priorities for cancer research in low- and middle-income countries: a global perspective.

C S Pramesh, Rajendra A Badwe, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy, Christopher M Booth, Girish Chinnaswamy, Anna J Dare, Victor Piana de Andrade, David J Hunter, Satish Gopal, Mary Gospodarowicz and 18 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prescription and use of psychoactive medications among cancer patients and associated factors in lower and upper middle-income countries: systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Effectiveness of Skill-Building Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Adults with Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

C S PrameshTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. prameshcs@tmc.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-0083
Rajendra A BadweTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nirmala Bhoo-PathyCentre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Christopher M BoothDepartments of Oncology and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Girish ChinnaswamyTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Anna J DareDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Victor Piana de AndradeA.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
David J HunterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Satish GopalCentre for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mary GospodarowiczPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjeeva GunasekeraNational Cancer Institute Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Andre IlbawiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sharon KapambweWorld Health Organization Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Peter KinghamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Tezer KutlukFaculty of Medicine and Cancer Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nirmal LamichhaneB.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Miriam MutebiAga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jackson OremUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Groesbeck ParhamUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Priya RanganathanTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Manju SengarTata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Richard SullivanInstitute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-1825
Soumya SwaminathanWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ian F TannockPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vivek TomarRise To Survive Cancer, New Delhi, India.
Verna VanderpuyeNational Center for Radiotherapy Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Cherian VargheseWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elisabete WeiderpassInternational Association for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-0128

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UK 29186Medical Research Council MR/W023903/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer research currently is heavily skewed toward high-income countries (HICs), with little research conducted in, and relevant to, the problems of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This regional discordance in cancer knowledge generation and application needs to be rebalanced. Several gaps in the research enterprise of LMICs need to be addressed to promote regionally relevant research, and radical rethinking is needed to address the burning issues in cancer care in these regions. We identified five top priorities in cancer research in LMICs based on current and projected needs: reducing the burden of patients with advanced disease; improving access and affordability, and outcomes of cancer treatment; value-based care and health economics; quality improvement and implementation research; and leveraging technology to improve cancer control. LMICs have an excellent opportunity to address important questions in cancer research that could impact cancer control globally. Success will require collaboration and commitment from governments, policy makers, funding agencies, health care organizations and leaders, researchers and the public.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesNeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareHumansIncomePovertyResearch

Identifiers

PMID35440716
PMCPMC9108683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.