Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440712›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygenation against peri- and post-procedural hypoxemia in patients with obesity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ching-Chung Ko, Po-Chih Chang, Kuei-Fen Wang, I-Chia Teng, Chien-Hung Lin, Ping-Wen Huang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. The use of remimazolamFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kuo-Chuan Hung *Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Ching-Chung Ko *Department of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Po-Chih ChangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital/Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Kuei-Fen WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
I-Chia TengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Chien-Hung LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Ping-Wen HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan.
Cheuk-Kwan SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, No.1, Yida Road, Jiaosu Village, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City, 82445, Taiwan. researchgate000@gmail.com.
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TWE-Da Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) against hypoxemia in patients with obesity compared with conventional oxygenation therapy and non-invasive ventilation. Databases were searched from inception to August 2021. Studies involving peri- or post-procedural use of HFNO were included. The primary outcome was risk of hypoxemia, while the secondary outcomes included status of oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We found that HFNO prolonged the safe apnea time at induction compared to control group [mean difference (MD) = 73.88 s, p = 0.0004; 2 RCTs] with no difference in risk of peri-procedural hypoxemia [relative risk (RR) = 0.91, p = 0.64; 4 RCTs], minimum SpO2 (MD = 0.09%, p = 0.95; 4 RCTs), PaO2 (MD = - 8.13 mmHg, p = 0.86; 3 RCTs), PaCO2 (MD = - 6.71%, p = 0.2; 2 RCTs), EtCO2 (MD = - 0.28 mmHg, p = 0.8; 4 RCTs) between the two groups. HFNO also did not improve postprocedural PaO2/FiO2 ratio (MD = 41.76, p = 0.58; 2 RCTs) and PaCO2 (MD = - 2.68 mmHg, p = 0.07; 2 RCTs). This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of HFNO may be associated with a longer safe apnea time without beneficial impact on the risk of hypoxemia, oxygenation, and CO2 elimination in patients with obesity. The limited number of trials warranted further large-scale studies to support our findings.

Indexed as

ApneaOxygen Inhalation TherapyHumansHypoxiaObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35440712
PMCPMC9018711
OpenAlexW4224228913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.