Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440593›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Widespread and increased drilling of wells into fossil aquifers in the USA.

Merhawi GebreEgziabher, Scott Jasechko, Debra Perrone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Agriculture's impact on water-energy balance varies across climates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Merhawi GebreEgziabherBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, CA, 93106, USA. gebremichael@ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8273-1792
Scott JasechkoBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-7708
Debra PerroneEnvironmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4268-8478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most stored groundwater is 'fossil' in its age, having been under the ground for more than ~12 thousand years. Mapping where wells tap fossil aquifers is relevant for water quality and quantity management. Nevertheless, the prevalence of wells that tap fossil aquifers is not known. Here we show that wells that are sufficiently deep to tap fossil aquifers are widespread, though they remain outnumbered by shallower wells in most areas. Moreover, the proportion of newly drilled wells that are deep enough to tap fossil aquifers has increased over recent decades. However, this widespread and increased drilling of wells into fossil aquifers is not necessarily associated with groundwater depletion, emphasizing that the presence of fossil groundwater does not necessarily indicate a non-renewable water supply. Our results highlight the importance of safeguarding fossil groundwater quality and quantity to meet present and future water demands.

Indexed as

GroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringFossilsUnited StatesWater QualityWater SupplyWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID35440593
PMCPMC9018791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.