Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440468›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care workers: a cross-sectional study.

Enric Aragonès, Isabel Del Cura-González, Lucía Hernández-Rivas, Elena Polentinos-Castro, Maria Isabel Fernández-San-Martín, Juan A López-Rodríguez, Josep M Molina-Aragonés, Franco Amigo, Itxaso Alayo, Philippe Mortier and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shared Trauma: An evolutionary model concept analysis in light of COVID-19.International journal of mental health nursing · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Enric AragonèsInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-4667
Isabel Del Cura-GonzálezResearch Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases, Madrid; Department of Medical Specialties and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid; Primary Care Research Unit (GAAP-SERMAS), Madrid Health Service, Madrid; Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-3931-5304
Lucía Hernández-RivasLa Paz University Hospital, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-3530
Elena Polentinos-CastroResearch Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases, Madrid; Department of Medical Specialties and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid; Primary Care Research Unit (GAAP-SERMAS), Madrid Health Service, Madrid; Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-2966
Maria Isabel Fernández-San-MartínInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-7182
Juan A López-RodríguezResearch Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases, Madrid; Department of Medical Specialties and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid; Primary Care Research Unit (GAAP-SERMAS), Madrid Health Service, Madrid; Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-4985-2314
Josep M Molina-AragonésInstitut Català de la Salut, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-8433
Franco AmigoHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-5168
Itxaso AlayoHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-7333-3450
Philippe MortierHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-6241
Montse FerrerHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-7391
Víctor Pérez-SolàDepartment of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona; CIBER Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid; Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-2337
Gemma VilagutHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid.ORCID 0000-0002-3714-226X
Jordi AlonsoHealth Services Research Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona; CIBERESP, Madrid; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona.ORCID 0000-0001-8627-9636
MINDCOVID-19 research group
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the mental health of healthcare workers, yet studies in primary care workers are scarce.

aimTo investigate the prevalence of and associated factors for psychological distress in primary care workers during the first COVID-19 outbreak. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a multicentre, cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted in primary healthcare workers in Spain, between May and September 2020.

methodHealthcare workers were invited to complete a survey to evaluate sociodemographic and work-related characteristics, COVID-19 infection status, exposure to patients with COVID-19, and resilience (using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), in addition to being screened for common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic attacks, and substance use disorder). Positive screening for any of these disorders was analysed globally using the term 'any current mental disorder'.

resultsA total of 2928 primary care professionals participated in the survey. Of them, 43.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41.9 to 45.4) tested positive for a current mental disorder. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% CI = 1.25 to 2.06), having previous mental disorders (OR 2.58, 95% CI = 2.15 to 3.10), greater occupational exposure to patients with COVID-19 (OR 2.63, 95% CI = 1.98 to 3.51), having children or dependents (OR 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.76 and OR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.11, respectively), or having an administrative job (OR 2.24, 95% CI = 1.66 to 3.03) were associated with a higher risk of any current mental disorder. Personal resilience was shown to be a protective factor.

conclusionAlmost half of primary care workers showed significant psychological distress. Strategies to support the mental health of primary care workers are necessary, including designing psychological support and resilience-building interventions based on risk factors identified.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemiccross-sectional studyhealth personnelmental healthprimary health carepsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID35440468
PMCPMC9037185
OpenAlexW4221100181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.