ArticleBMJ open2022
Willingness for community-based and institutional eldercare among older adults: a cross-sectional study in Zhejiang, China.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing of the measure for unfinished care among nursing assistants in long-term care homes in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Elderly care needs and factors influencing negative emotions among first-generation only child parents in a Chinese city.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- The expectations and acceptability of a smart nursing home model among Chinese older adults: a mixed methods study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Preference for care models among older people living with HIV: cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Study on the time and scale of mutual aid for aging care under the background of active aging.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Choice Preference of Middle-Aged and Elderly People on Integrated Medical Services and Elderly Care Model: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the proportion of willingness for community-based and institutional care and their correlating factors among older adults in Zhejiang Province, China.
designCross-sectional study.
settingThe Sixth National Health Service Survey, carried out in Zhejiang, China.
participants7300 eligible older adults aged 60 years or older. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Willingness for community-based and institutional eldercare.
resultsThe average age of the participants was 69.0±7.3 years. 50.9% of the participants were males, and 49.1% were females. 19.2% came from urban areas and 80.8% were from rural areas. The percentage of willingness for community-based and institutional eldercare was 2.7% and 3.8%, respectively. The corresponding figures for females were 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively, and for males were 2.5% and 4.1%, respectively. Factors positively associated with willingness for community-based eldercare included living in urban areas, high educational attainment, more frequent active exercise and living alone. Factors positively associated with willingness for institutional eldercare included age, living at urban areas, high education attainment, more frequent active exercise and receiving assistance with daily living.
conclusionsFamily eldercare was the priority for older adults compared with community-based and institutional eldercare in Zhejiang. The willingness for community-based and institutional eldercare among older adults was affected not only by the older adults themselves, but also by community and family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.