Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440450›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.

Moniek Y Koopman, Jorn J W Reijnders, Robert T A Willemsen, Rykel van Bruggen, Carine J M Doggen, Bas Kietselaer, Martijn J Oude Wolcherink, Peter M A van Ooijen, Jan Willem C Gratama, Richard Braam and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selection and reporting of usual care comparators when designing primary care trials of complex health interventions: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Updates on CAD risk assessment: using the coronary artery calcium score in combination with traditional risk factors.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  6. A Review of the Roles and Limitations of Noninvasive Imaging Methods for Investigating Cardiovascular Disease in Individuals with Obesity.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Moniek Y KoopmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5082-409X
Jorn J W ReijndersDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Robert T A WillemsenDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rykel van BruggenMulticenter General Practitioners Organisation 'HuisartsenOrganisatie Oost-Gelderland', Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Carine J M DoggenDepartment of Health Technology & Services Research, Techmed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Bas KietselaerDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Martijn J Oude WolcherinkDepartment of Health Technology & Services Research, Techmed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Peter M A van OoijenDepartment of Data Science Center in Health, University of Groniningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem C GratamaDepartment of Radiology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Richard BraamDepartment of Cardiology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Matthijs OudkerkDepartment of Medical Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan DinantDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rozemarijn VliegenthartDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands r.vliegenthart@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-3376
University Medical Center Groningen · NLGelre Hospitals · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Twente · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLDutch College of General Practitioners · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIdentifying and excluding coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with atypical angina pectoris (AP) and non-specific thoracic complaints is a challenge for general practitioners (GPs). A diagnostic and prognostic tool could help GPs in determining the likelihood of CAD and guide patient management. Studies in outpatient settings have shown that the CT-based coronary calcium score (CCS) has high accuracy for diagnosis and exclusion of CAD. However, the CT CCS test has not been tested in a primary care setting. In the COroNary Calcium scoring as fiRst-linE Test to dEtect and exclude coronary artery disease in GPs patients with stable chest pain (CONCRETE) study, the impact of direct access of GPs to CT CCS will be investigated. We hypothesise that this will allow for early diagnosis of CAD and treatment, more efficient referral to the cardiologist and a reduction of healthcare-related costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CONCRETE is a pragmatic multicentre trial with a cluster randomised design, in which direct GP access to the CT CCS test is compared with standard of care. In both arms, at least 40 GP offices, and circa 800 patients with atypical AP and non-specific thoracic complaints will be included. To determine the increase in detection and treatment rate of CAD in GP offices, the CVRM registration rate is derived from the GPs electronic registration system. Individual patients' data regarding cardiovascular risk factors, expressed chest pain complaints, quality of life, downstream testing and CAD diagnosis will be collected through questionnaires and the electronic GP dossier. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: CONCRETE has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center of Groningen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 7475; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseGeneral PractitionersAngina PectorisCalciumChest PainCoronary AngiographyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCalciumchest paincomputed tomographycoronary artery diseasecoronary calcium scoregeneral practitionersprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35440450
PMCPMC9020291
OpenAlexW4224298098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.