Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440441›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2022

Recently developed drugs for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a research and development case study.

Christophe Perrin, Katy Athersuch, Greg Elder, Manuel Martin, Alain Alsalhani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. When are Uncontrolled Trials in TB Scientifically and Ethically Justified: Borrowing Wisdom From Early AIDS Clinical Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bedaquiline Delivery Innovations: A Review on Advancing MDR-TB Treatment Strategies.Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christophe PerrinAccess Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Paris, France Christophe.PERRIN@paris.msf.org.
Katy AthersuchAccess Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Geneva, Switzerland.
Greg ElderAccess Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Geneva, Switzerland.
Manuel MartinAccess Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alain AlsalhaniAccess Campaign, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Paris, France.
Médecins Sans Frontières · CHMédecins Sans Frontières · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two drugs with novel mechanisms of action, the diarylquinoline bedaquiline and the nitroimidazole delamanid-as well as pretomanid from the same class of drugs as delamanid-have recently become available to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) after many decades of little innovation in the field of DR-TB treatment. Despite evidence of improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of multidrug regimens including the two agents, access to bedaquiline and delamanid has been limited in many settings with a high burden of DR-TB and consistently poor treatment outcomes. Aside from regulatory, logistic and cost barriers at country level, uptake of the novel agents was complicated by gaps in knowledge for optimal use in clinical practice after initial market approval. The main incentives of the current pharmaceutical research and development paradigm are structured around obtaining regulatory approval, which in turn requires efficacy and safety data generated by clinical trials. Recently completed and ongoing clinical trials did not answer critical questions of how to provide shorter, less toxic treatment DR-TB treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and delamanid and improve patient outcomes. Voluntary generation of evidence that is not part of this process-yet essential from a clinical or policy perspective-has been left to non-sponsor partners and researchers, often without collaborative efforts to improve post-regulatory approval access to life-saving drugs. Additionally, these efforts are currently not recognised in the value chain of the research and development process, and there are no incentives to make this critical research happen in a coordinated way.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantHumansOxazolesResearchTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsOxazolespublic healthtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35440441
PMCPMC9020285
OpenAlexW4224236395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.