ReviewBMJ global health2022
Recently developed drugs for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a research and development case study.
Review in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing timelines and evidence available to support new TB, HIV, and HCV drug approvals: The same, only different.PloS one · 2022Trial
- When are Uncontrolled Trials in TB Scientifically and Ethically Justified: Borrowing Wisdom From Early AIDS Clinical Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Building a case for accelerated clinical development of drugs and vaccines - what are the driving forces?Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Orchestrating faster access to products of non-profit R&D: a case study of a novel regimen for drug-resistant tuberculosis.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Investigation of delamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid resistance rates and related gene mutations in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in regional tuberculosis reference laboratories of Iran.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Cost analysis of the TB-PRACTECAL clinical trial on novel tuberculosis treatment regimens.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Bedaquiline Delivery Innovations: A Review on Advancing MDR-TB Treatment Strategies.Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery · 2025Review
- Novel Prodrug Strategies for the Treatment of Tuberculosis.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Discovery Based on Hydrazide-Hydrazone and Thiadiazole Derivatives Targeting InhA.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mutations and insights into the molecular mechanisms of resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first-line.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two drugs with novel mechanisms of action, the diarylquinoline bedaquiline and the nitroimidazole delamanid-as well as pretomanid from the same class of drugs as delamanid-have recently become available to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) after many decades of little innovation in the field of DR-TB treatment. Despite evidence of improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of multidrug regimens including the two agents, access to bedaquiline and delamanid has been limited in many settings with a high burden of DR-TB and consistently poor treatment outcomes. Aside from regulatory, logistic and cost barriers at country level, uptake of the novel agents was complicated by gaps in knowledge for optimal use in clinical practice after initial market approval. The main incentives of the current pharmaceutical research and development paradigm are structured around obtaining regulatory approval, which in turn requires efficacy and safety data generated by clinical trials. Recently completed and ongoing clinical trials did not answer critical questions of how to provide shorter, less toxic treatment DR-TB treatment regimens containing bedaquiline and delamanid and improve patient outcomes. Voluntary generation of evidence that is not part of this process-yet essential from a clinical or policy perspective-has been left to non-sponsor partners and researchers, often without collaborative efforts to improve post-regulatory approval access to life-saving drugs. Additionally, these efforts are currently not recognised in the value chain of the research and development process, and there are no incentives to make this critical research happen in a coordinated way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.