Auditory perception dominates in motor rhythm reproduction.

Alexandra Hildebrandt, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Perception, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Spatial distances affect temporal prediction and interception.Scientific reports · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra HildebrandtDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Institute of Sport Science, 9378Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-2076

Eric GrießbachDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Institute of Sport Science, 9378Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.

Rouwen Cañal-BrulandDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Institute of Sport Science, 9378Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly agreed that vision is more sensitive to spatial information, while audition is more sensitive to temporal information. When both visual and auditory information are available simultaneously, the modality appropriateness hypothesis predicts that, depending on the task, the most appropriate (i.e., reliable) modality dominates perception. While previous research mainly focused on

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationHumansPhotic StimulationReproductionmodality appropriateness hypothesismultisensory integrationperception/actionrhythm reproductiontemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID35440242

DOI10.1177/03010066221093604

PMCPMC9121532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.