Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440142›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2022

Human Cerebellar Development and Transcriptomics: Implications for Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Parthiv Haldipur, Kathleen J Millen, Kimberly A Aldinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Building the Bergmann glial scaffold: Early arrivals and stops along the way in human cerebellar development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Spatiotemporal histogenesis of the developing human cerebellum reveals dynamic layering of Bergmann glia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parthiv HaldipurCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; email: kathleen.millen@seattlechildrens.org.
Kathleen J MillenCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; email: kathleen.millen@seattlechildrens.org.
Kimberly A AldingerCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; email: kathleen.millen@seattlechildrens.org.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Mentored Career DevelopmentKL2TR001854 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Elizabeth Rhea Erwin Burner, Amy Elizabeth West · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Pathological Mechanisms of Human Cerebellar MalformationsR37NS095733 · NINDS · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Kathleen Joyce Millen · 2021 to 2026
$5.5M
High resolution analysis of human cerebellar neurogenesisR21NS117848 · NINDS · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HALDIPUR, PARTHIV · 2021 to 2022
$514k
Investigating the cellular and molecular neuropathology of the cerebellum in autismR21MH126244 · NIMH · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ALDINGER, KIMBERLY ANNE · 2021 to 2022
$502k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001854NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH126244NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS117848NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS095733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental abnormalities of the cerebellum are among the most recognized structural brain malformations in human prenatal imaging. Yet reliable information regarding their cause in humans is sparse, and few outcome studies are available to inform prognosis. We know very little about human cerebellar development, in stark contrast to the wealth of knowledge from decades of research on cerebellar developmental biology of model organisms, especially mice. Recent studies show that multiple aspects of human cerebellar development significantly differ from mice and even rhesus macaques, a nonhuman primate. These discoveries challenge many current mouse-centric models of normal human cerebellar development and models regarding the pathogenesis of several neurodevelopmental phenotypes affecting the cerebellum, including Dandy-Walker malformation and medulloblastoma. Since we cannot model what we do not know, additional normative and pathological human developmental data are essential, and new models are needed.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsNeurodevelopmental DisordersAnimalsCerebellumFemaleHumansMacaca mulattaMicePregnancyTranscriptomegeneticshistologymalformationneurogenesisrhombic lipventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID35440142
PMCPMC9271632
OpenAlexW4224257264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.