Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440022›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's research & therapy2022

Meaningful benefits: a framework to assess disease-modifying therapies in preclinical and early Alzheimer's disease.

Sheila Seleri Assunção, Reisa A Sperling, Craig Ritchie, Diana R Kerwin, Paul S Aisen, Claire Lansdall, Alireza Atri, Jeffrey Cummings

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sheila Seleri AssunçãoUS Medical Affairs - Neuroscience, Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA, USA. seleri.sheila@gene.com.
Reisa A SperlingBrigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Craig RitchieEdinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Diana R KerwinKerwin Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Paul S AisenUniversity of Southern California Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
Claire LansdallF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Alireza AtriBanner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA.
Jeffrey CummingsChambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Banner Sun Health Research Institute · USLa Roche College · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHSt. Mary-Corwin Medical Center · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

The Alzheimer's Clinical Trial Consortium - Down Syndrome Network (ACTC- DSN)U24AG057437 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Paul S. Aisen, RONALD C PETERSEN · 2018 to 2026
$198.4M
Trial-Ready Cohort for Preclinical/Prodromal Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG053798 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AISEN, PAUL S., CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2017 to 2022
$39.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI Nicholas Ashton · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Renewal of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (Phase 2) CNTN - ResubmissionP20GM109025 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI JESSICA KIRKLAND CALDWELL · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Detection, Diagnosis, Course, and Risk FactorsU01NS093334 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L., REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2016 to 2022
$17.0M
Alzheimer's Clinical Trial InnOvatioN (ACTION) InitiativeR35AG071476 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R35 AG071476NIA NIH HHS U24 AG057437NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need for preventive therapies that interrupt the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) before the onset of symptoms or when symptoms are emerging is urgent and has spurred the ongoing development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in preclinical and early AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] to mild dementia). Assessing the meaningfulness of what are likely small initial treatment effects in these earlier stages of the AD patho-clinical disease continuum is a major challenge and warrants further consideration. BODY: To accommodate a shift towards earlier intervention in AD, we propose meaningful benefits as a new umbrella concept that encapsulates the spectrum of potentially desirable outcomes that may be demonstrated in clinical trials and other studies across the AD continuum, with an emphasis on preclinical AD and early AD (i.e., MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia). The meaningful benefits framework applies to data collection, assessment, and communication across three dimensions: (1) multidimensional clinical outcome assessments (COAs) including not only core disease outcomes related to cognition and function but also patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, health and economic outcomes, and neuropsychiatric symptoms; (2) complementary analyses that help contextualize and expand the understanding of COA-based assessments, such as number-needed-to-treat or time-to-event analyses; and (3) assessment of both cumulative benefit and predictive benefit, where early changes on cognitive, functional, or biomarker assessments predict longer-term clinical benefit.

conclusionThe concept of meaningful benefits emphasizes the importance of multidimensional reporting of clinical trial data while, conceptually, it advances our understanding of treatment effects in preclinical AD and mild cognitive impairment due to AD. We propose that such an approach will help bridge the gap between the emergence of DMTs and their clinical use, particularly now that a DMT is available for patients diagnosed with MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementiaCognitionDisease ProgressionHumansAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkersClinical meaningfulnessClinical trialsMeaningful benefitMild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s diseasePreclinical

Identifiers

PMID35440022
PMCPMC9017027
OpenAlexW4224216819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.