Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439873›Full record

ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2022

Second-line Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 on gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Yeun-Yoon Kim, Ji Hye Min, Jeong Ah Hwang, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Dong Hyun Sinn, Hyo Keun Lim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yeun-Yoon KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Hye MinDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Ah HwangDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Kyoung JeongDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Hyun SinnDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyo Keun LimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Sciences, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the utility of second-line contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using Sonazoid in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 (LR-3) and 4 (LR-4) observations on gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsThis retrospective study included LR-3 or LR-4 observations on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI subsequently evaluated with CEUS from 2013 to 2017. The presence of MRI features, CEUSarterial phase hyperenhancement (CEUS-APHE), and Kupffer phase defect (KPD) was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant imaging features associated with the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The optimal diagnostic criteria were investigated using the McNemar test.

resultsIn total, 104 patients with 104 observations (63 HCCs) were included. The presence of both CEUS-APHE and KPD on CEUS enabled the additional detection of 42.3% (11/26) of LR-3 HCCs and 78.4% (29/37) of LR-4 HCCs. Transitional phase (TP) hypointensity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 10.59; P<0.001), restricted diffusion (adjusted OR, 7.55; P=0.004), and KPD (adjusted OR, 7.16; P=0.003) were significant imaging features for HCC diagnosis. The presence of at least two significant imaging features was optimal for HCC diagnosis (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 88.9%, 78.1%, and 84.6%, respectively), with significantly higher sensitivity than the presence of both CEUS-APHE and KPD (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 63.5% [P=0.001], 92.7% [P=0.077], and 75.0% [P=0.089], respectively).

conclusionThe combined interpretation of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and second-line CEUS using Sonazoid, focusing on TP hypointensity, restricted diffusion, and KPD, may be optimal for further characterizing LR-3 and LR-4 observations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDiagnosisKupffer cellsPerfluorobutaneUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35439873
PMCPMC9262668
OpenAlexW4210666188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.