Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439705›Full record

ArticleComplementary therapies in clinical practice2022

Quantifying the emotional experiences of partners of veterans with PTSD service dogs using ecological momentary assessment.

Leanne O Nieforth, Ahmad Hakeem Abdul Wahab, Arman Sabbaghi, Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth, Daniel Foti, Marguerite E O'Haire

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Complementary therapies in clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leanne O NieforthCenter for the Human Animal Bond, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: lniefort@purdue.edu.
Ahmad Hakeem Abdul WahabJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, USA. Electronic address: aabdulw1@its.jnj.com.
Arman SabbaghiDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: sabbaghi@purdue.edu.
Shelley MacDermid WadsworthHuman Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: shelley@purdue.edu.
Daniel FotiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: foti@purdue.edu.
Marguerite E O'HaireCenter for the Human Animal Bond, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: mohaire@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USJanssen (United States) · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002531 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FOTI, DANIEL JUSTIN, HURLEY, THOMAS D. · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Quantifying the efficacy and role of service dogs for military veterans with PTSD and their spousesR21HD091896 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI O'HAIRE, MARGUERITE ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2018
$415k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002531NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD091896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the day-to-day experiences of positive and negative emotions among partners of veterans assigned service dogs for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As part of a larger clinical trial, a total of N = 87 partners of post-9/11 veterans with PTSD were recruited from a nonprofit service dog provider and participated in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol. The sample included partners of veterans who received a PTSD service dog after baseline (n = 48, treatment group) and partners of veterans on the waitlist for a service dog (n = 39, control group). Data were collected twice daily for two weeks at baseline and again at follow-up three months later, for approximately 56 assessments per participant (28 at baseline, 28 at follow up). Participants completed an average of 84% of questionnaires at baseline (n = 23.6) and 86% (n = 24.1) at follow-up. A total of 3780 EMA questionnaires were collected among partners for this analysis. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. Three months following baseline, partners of veterans with service dogs reported statistically significant higher levels of positive emotions than the control partners (p = .01, d = 0.39) with small-to-medium effect sizes for each individual positive emotion. No statistically significant differences were reported for negative emotions (p = .77, d = 0.21). This study quantitatively identifies higher levels of positive emotion in partners who are cohabitating with a PTSD service dog compared to those partners who remained on the waitlist. Given the influence that positive emotions have on well-being and coping, findings suggest that the influence of service dogs may go beyond veterans to influence their cohabitating partners.

Indexed as

EmotionsService AnimalsSpousesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAnimalsDogsEcological Momentary AssessmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID35439705
PMCPMC11212122
OpenAlexW4223635590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.