Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439440›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2022

Prospective Multisite Cohort Study to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making Utilization Among Individuals Screened for Lung Cancer.

Tina D Tailor, M Patricia Rivera, Danielle D Durham, Pasangi Perera, Lindsay Lane, Louise M Henderson

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Notes Contain Limited Documentation of Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tina D TailorFellowship Director, Cardiothoracic Radiology and Research Director, Duke Lung Cancer Screening Program, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
M Patricia RiveraDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Director, Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Screening Program and Co-Director, North Carolina Lung Screening Registry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Danielle D DurhamDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Pasangi PereraDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lindsay LaneDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Louise M HendersonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Program Co-Lead, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Co-Director, North Carolina Lung Screening Registry, and Director, Radiologic Sciences Faculty Development, Radiology Department, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: louise_henderson@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterDuke University · US

Funding

Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Patterns and Outcomes through a North Carolina RegistryR01CA212014 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Louise Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Comorbidity and Functional Status in a Population Undergoing Lung Cancer ScreeningR01CA251686 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, LOUISE, RIVERA, MARIA PATRICIA · 2020 to 2023
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212014NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the frequency, components of, and factors associated with shared decision-making (SDM) discussions according to electronic health record (EHR) documentation among individuals undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS).

methodsA prospective observational cohort study was conducted of individuals undergoing LCS between February 2015 and June 2020 at four LCS centers. The primary outcome was EHR-documented SDM, defined using Medicare-designated components. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine predictors of EHR-documented SDM. A secondary outcome was agreement of individual's self-report of SDM and EHR-documented SDM, evaluated using Cohen's κ statistic.

resultsAmong screened individuals, 41.9% (243 of 580) had EHR-documented SDM, and 71.1% (295 of 415) had self-reported SDM. Decision aids were used in 55.6% of EHR-documented SDM encounters (135 of 243), and 21.8% of documented SDM encounters (53 of 243) included all Medicare-designated components. SDM was documented more frequently in individuals with body mass index ≥ 25 versus <25 kg/m

conclusionsAlthough EHR-documented SDM occurred in fewer than half of individuals undergoing LCS, self-reported SDM rates were higher, suggesting that SDM may be underdocumented in the EHR. In addition, EHR-documented SDM was more likely in individuals with higher body mass index and those referred for LCS by pulmonary clinicians. These findings indicate areas for improvement in the implementation and documentation of SDM.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesDecision MakingHumansMedicarePatient ParticipationProspective StudiesUnited Statesearly detection of cancerlung neoplasmsmass screeningShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID35439440
PMCPMC9357041
OpenAlexW4223899017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.