Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439426›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2022

Understanding Everyday Events: Predictive-Looking Errors Drive Memory Updating.

Christopher N Wahlheim, Michelle L Eisenberg, David Stawarczyk, Jeffrey M Zacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Anticipatory eye gaze as a marker of memory.Communications psychology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  9. The role of visual and auditory information in social event segmentation.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. False memories for ending of events.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher N WahlheimDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-1493
Michelle L EisenbergDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0001-7276-2176
David StawarczykDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
Jeffrey M ZacksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.

Funding

AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
EVERYDAY MEMORY IN AGING AND EARLY ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER21AG052314 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2016 to 2017
$419k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG052314NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory-guided predictions can improve event comprehension by guiding attention and the eyes to the location where an actor is about to perform an action. But when events change, viewers may experience predictive-looking errors and need to update their memories. In two experiments (

Indexed as

MemoryMental RecallAttentionEyeHumansLearningaction observationevent cognitionmemory updatingmnemonic prediction erroropen dataopen materialspredictive looking

Identifiers

PMID35439426
PMCPMC9248286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.