Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439334›Full record

Observational studyCancer2022

Frailty and checkpoint inhibitor toxicity in older patients with melanoma.

Cheryl P Bruijnen, José J Koldenhof, Rik J Verheijden, Frederiek van den Bos, Mariëlle H Emmelot-Vonk, Petronella O Witteveen, Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. [Suspicion of sarcopenia as a predictor of toxicity in older people with cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl P BruijnenDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-3421
José J KoldenhofDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4205-6611
Rik J VerheijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frederiek van den BosDepartment of Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mariëlle H Emmelot-VonkDepartment of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Petronella O WitteveenDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Karijn P M SuijkerbuijkDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that range from mild to life-threatening. Age itself does not seem to be a predictor for the occurrence of irAEs. It is unknown whether frailty plays a role in the occurrence of irAEs. Therefore, the authors assessed whether irAEs and their sequelae occur more often in frail patients than in fit patients according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) assessment.

methodsPatients with melanoma aged 70 years and older who were about to start ICI therapy and were screened with the G8 assessment were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Patients were classified by the G8 as either fit or frail. The primary outcome was the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs.

resultsIn total, 92 patients were included for statistical analyses, 26 (29%) of whom were classified as frail. Grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 20% of patients. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs between fit and frail patients (17% vs 27%; P = .26). Frail patients were admitted to the hospital because of irAEs significantly more often than fit patients (29% vs 54%; P = .02) and showed a trend toward increased length of hospitalization (5 vs 8 days; P = .06) and more frequent use of immunosuppressants or ICI discontinuation for irAEs (36% vs 58%; P = .06).

conclusionsAlthough frailty appears to be unrelated to the occurrence of severe irAEs, it is an indicator of irAE-related adverse sequelae, such as hospital admission. Screening for frailty can be of added value in the shared decision-making process for older patients who qualify for ICI treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFrailtyMelanomaAgedAged, 80 and overHospitalizationHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalfrailtyGeriatric 8immune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune-related adverse eventsmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID35439334
PMCPMC9325486
OpenAlexW4224239565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.