Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439246›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2022

Evaluation of an online intervention for improving stroke survivors' health-related quality of life: A randomised controlled trial.

Ashleigh Guillaumier, Neil J Spratt, Michael Pollack, Amanda Baker, Parker Magin, Alyna Turner, Christopher Oldmeadow, Clare Collins, Robin Callister, Chris Levi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ashleigh GuillaumierUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-3228
Neil J SprattUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael PollackUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-0934
Amanda BakerUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-7146
Parker MaginUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-8749
Alyna TurnerUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7389-2546
Christopher OldmeadowHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6104-1322
Clare CollinsUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3298-756X
Robin CallisterUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris LeviUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-796X
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-9735
Simon DeemingHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-3936
Brigid ClancyUniversity of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2405-6327
Billie BonevskiFlinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8505-622X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUDeakin University · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an online health behaviour change intervention-Prevent 2nd Stroke (P2S)-at improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) amongst stroke survivors at 6 months of follow-up. METHODS AND

findingsA prospective, blinded-endpoint randomised controlled trial, with stroke survivors as the unit of randomisation, was conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Adult stroke survivors between 6 and 36 months post-stroke with capacity to use the intervention (determined by a score of ≥4 on the Modified Rankin Scale) and who had access and willingness to use the internet were recruited via mail-out invitations from 1 national and 1 regional stroke registry. Participants completed baseline (n = 399) and 6-month follow-up (n = 356; 89%) outcome assessments via computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). At baseline the sample had an average age of 66 years (SD 12), and 65% were male. Randomisation occurred at the end of the baseline survey; CATI assessors and independent statisticians were blind to group allocation. The intervention group received remote access for a 12-week period to the online-only P2S program (n = 199; n = 28 lost at follow-up). The control group were emailed and posted a list of internet addresses of generic health websites (n = 200; n = 15 lost at follow-up). The primary outcome was HRQoL as measured by the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS; self-rated global health); the outcome was assessed for differences between treatment groups at follow-up, adjusting for baseline measures. Secondary outcomes were HRQoL as measured by the EQ-5D (descriptive health state), diet quality, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, mood, physical functioning, and independent living. All outcomes included the variable 'stroke event (stroke/transient ischaemic attack/other)' as a covariate, and analysis was intention-to-treat. At 6 months, median EQ-VAS HRQoL score was significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group (85 vs 80, difference 5, 95% CI 0.79-9.21, p = 0.020). The results were robust to the assumption the data were missing at random; however, the results were not robust to the assumption that the difference in HRQoL between those with complete versus missing data was at least 3 points. Significantly higher proportions of people in the intervention group reported no problems with personal care (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.05-4.48, p = 0.0359) and usual activities (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06-2.60, p = 0.0256) than in the control group. There were no significant differences between groups on all other secondary outcomes. The main limitation of the study is that the sample comprises mostly 'well' stroke survivors with limited to no disability.

conclusionsThe P2S online healthy lifestyle program improved stroke survivors' self-reported global ratings of HRQoL (as measured by EQ-VAS) at 6-month follow-up. Online platforms represent a promising tool to engage and support some stroke survivors.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617001205325.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionStrokeAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID35439246
PMCPMC9017949
OpenAlexW4224214678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.