Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439100›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Impact of polio vaccines (oral polio vaccine - OPV or inactivated polio vaccine - IPV) on rotavirus vaccine-associated intussusception.

Camila Cristina Martini Rodrigues, Eder Gatti Fernandes, Paulo Piva Dos Santos, Renato Yoshio Eguti, Antonio Carlos Pedroso-de-Lima, Gisela Tunes da Silva, Ana Marli Christovam Sartori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Cristina Martini RodriguesParasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP)Departamento de Molestias Infecciosas e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5340-5886
Eder Gatti FernandesDivisao de Imunizacoes, Centro de Vigilancia Epidemiologica, Centro de Controle de Doenças, Secretaria de Estado da Saude de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-7063
Paulo Piva Dos SantosEstatistica, USPDepartamento de Estatistica, Instituto de Matematica e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9246-6611
Renato Yoshio EgutiEstatistica, USPDepartamento de Estatistica, Instituto de Matematica e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-8217
Antonio Carlos Pedroso-de-LimaEstatistica, USPDepartamento de Estatistica, Instituto de Matematica e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0617-328X
Gisela Tunes da SilvaEstatistica, USPDepartamento de Estatistica, Instituto de Matematica e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3088-3134
Ana Marli Christovam SartoriParasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP)Departamento de Molestias Infecciosas e , Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3777-0757
Universidade de São Paulo · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although safe, rotavirus vaccines have been associated with increased intussusception risk. In Brazil, after the oral human rotavirus vaccine (OHRV) introduction in the childhood immunization, in 2006, increased intussusception risk was identified after the second OHRV dose, whereas in other countries, higher risk was associated to the first vaccine dose. It was hypothesized that the concomitant use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in Brazil might explain this difference. In 2012, the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) was adopted in the first two doses of Brazilian childhood immunization schedule, creating an opportunity to study the subject. Our objective was analyzing the impact of polio vaccines on rotavirus-associated intussusception. We used surveillance data on intussusception in infants living in São Paulo State. Two periods were considered: an OPV-period (March 2006 to June 2012) and an IPV-period (October 2012 to December 2017). The period from June to September 2012 were considered as transition. Self-controlled case series analysis with event-dependent exposure was performed, considering two risk periods (7 and 21 days post-vaccination). We identified 325 intussusception cases in infants reported to the surveillance systems during the study period. The statistical analysis included 221 cases that occurred within 60 days after vaccination. Overall, a higher intussusception risk was observed in the first week after vaccination for both the first (Relative Incidence [RI] = 4.3, 95%CI 2.8-6.5, p < .001) and second vaccine doses (RI = 4.2, 95%CI 2.7-6.4; p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in intussusception risk according to the rotavirus vaccine dose and the polio vaccine (OPV or IPV) administered concomitantly.

Indexed as

IntussusceptionPoliomyelitisRotavirusRotavirus VaccinesBrazilChildHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralVaccinationPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralRotavirus Vaccinesintussusceptionpoliovirus vaccine, inactivatedpoliovirus vaccinesRotavirus vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35439100
PMCPMC9897637
OpenAlexW4224251513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.