Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35439029›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Phase Ib Study of Navicixizumab Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer.

Siqing Fu, Bradley R Corr, Kerry Culm-Merdek, Colleen Mockbee, Hagop Youssoufian, Robert Stagg, R Wendel Naumann, Robert M Wenham, Rafael D Rosengarten, Laura Benjamin and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Bispecific Antibodies in Solid Tumors: Advances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. NOTCH3 and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siqing FuDivision of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-0419
Bradley R CorrUniversity of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO.
Kerry Culm-MerdekOncXerna Therapeutics Inc, Waltham, MA.
Colleen MockbeeOncXerna Therapeutics Inc, Waltham, MA.
Hagop YoussoufianOncXerna Therapeutics Inc, Waltham, MA.
Robert StaggOncoMed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Redwood City, CA.
R Wendel NaumannGynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-165X
Robert M WenhamGynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-8885
Rafael D RosengartenGenialis Inc, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3216-4048
Laura BenjaminOncXerna Therapeutics Inc, Waltham, MA.
Erika Paige HamiltonSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-0336
Kathleen N MooreSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-0718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase Ib study evaluated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus navicixizumab, a bispecific antiangiogenic antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor and delta-like ligand 4, against platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalation and -expansion study included 44 patients with previously treated, recurrent, platinum-resistant grade 2/3 ovarian cancer. Treatment was intravenous navicixizumab (3 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m

resultsThe dose-escalation cohorts enrolled patients at navicixizumab doses of 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 3) and 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 2); 3 mg/kg was selected for expansion (n = 39). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (6.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.5%). Pulmonary hypertension occurred in 18.2% (grade 1-2). The overall objective response rate was 43.2% (95% CI, 28.3 to 59.0): 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3 to 52.8) in patients previously treated with bevacizumab, 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1 to 87.2) in bevacizumab-naive patients, and 62% (95% CI, 31.6 to 86.1) in biomarker-positive patients. The median duration of response was 6 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable).

conclusionNavicixizumab plus paclitaxel demonstrated promising clinical activity in bevacizumab-treated and -naive patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with manageable toxicity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsAntibodies, BispecificBevacizumabCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansPaclitaxelPlatinumRetrospective StudiesRNATumor MicroenvironmentVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntibodies, BispecificBevacizumabnavicixizumabPaclitaxelPlatinumRNAVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID35439029
PMCPMC9362870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.