Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35438798›Full record

SynthesisChild development2022

Crying in the first 12 months of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-country parent-reported data and modeling of the "cry curve".

Arnault-Quentin Vermillet, Katrine Tølbøll, Samouil Litsis Mizan, Joshua C Skewes, Christine E Parsons

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exclusive breastfeeding and infantile colic: a cohort study.International breastfeeding journal · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arnault-Quentin VermilletInteracting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Katrine TølbøllDepartment for Linguistics, Cognitive Science, and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Samouil Litsis MizanDepartment for Linguistics, Cognitive Science, and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Joshua C SkewesInteracting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christine E ParsonsDepartment for Linguistics, Cognitive Science, and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-6308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crying is an ubiquitous communicative signal in infancy. This meta-analysis synthesizes data on parent-reported infant cry durations from 17 countries and 57 studies until infant age 12 months (N = 7580, 54% female from k = 44; majority White samples, where reported, k = 18), from studies before the end Sept. 2020. Most studies were conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada (k = 32), and at the traditional cry "peak" (age 5-6 weeks), where the pooled estimate for cry and fuss duration was 126 mins (SD = 61), with high heterogeneity. Formal modeling of the meta-analytic data suggests that the duration of crying remains substantial in the first year of life, after an initial decline.

Indexed as

CryingParentsCanadaFemaleHumansInfantIrritable MoodMaleResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID35438798
PMCPMC9541248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.