ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2022
Epidemiology and Management of Orbital Cellulitis in Children.
Review in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volumetrics and abscess-to-orbit ratio in surgically managed subperiosteal abscesses.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Adjunctive systemic corticosteroids in pediatric orbital cellulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Impact of COVID-19 on the epidemiology of severe sinogenic and otogenic infections and their intracranial complications.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Clinical characteristics of children hospitalized with cellulitis in Spain (2016-2022). A population-based analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Pediatric orbital subperiosteal abscess outbreak in Iran: characteristics and causes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Overwhelming orbital cellulitis in a neonate.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Infantile orbital abscess caused by methicillin-resistantFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Clinical Markers of Need for Surgery in Orbital Complication of Acute Rhinosinusitis in Children: Overview and Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe epidemiology of orbital cellulitis likely has evolved due to the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the adoption of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination. In the absence of published guidelines, management is highly variable. We characterized epidemiology and management over an 11-year period.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of children 0 to 21 years of age with orbital cellulitis +/- subperiosteal orbital abscess hospitalized at a large quaternary children's hospital from January 2008 to June 2018. We reviewed charts for demographic characteristics, clinical features, management, and outcomes. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated predictors of surgical intervention and assessed whether corticosteroid use or antibiotic duration was related to clinical outcomes.
resultsAmong 220 patients, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was the most common organism (26.3%), with MRSA found in only 5.0%. Rates of vancomycin use fluctuated annually from 40.9% to 84.6%. Surgery was performed in 39.5% of the patients. Corticosteroids, used in 70 patients (32.1%), were unrelated to treatment failure (n = 9), defined as persistent signs and symptoms or initial clinical improvement followed by worsening (P = .137). The median antibiotic duration was 17 days (interquartile range 14-26). After controlling for age, gender, proptosis, eye pain with movement, eyelid swelling, neutrophil count, and corticosteroid use, treatment failure was not significantly associated with receipt of ≥ 3 weeks of antibiotic therapy (8/84, 9.5%) compared with > 2 but < 3 weeks (0/51, 0.0%) or ≤ 2 weeks (1/85, 1.2%) (adjusted odds ratio = 5.83 for ≥ 3 vs ≤2 weeks; 95% confidence interval: 0.58, 59.0).
conclusionsAlthough MRSA was rare, empiric vancomycin use was high. Treatment failure was uncommon in patients who received ≤ 2 weeks of therapy, suggesting that shorter durations are adequate in some patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.