Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35438755›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2022

Association of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Neurologic Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Muhammad Zain Farooq, Sheeba Ba Aqeel, Prasanth Lingamaneni, Rayli Carolina Pichardo, Aleeza Jawed, Saad Khalid, Shristi Upadhyay Banskota, Pingfu Fu, Ankit Mangla

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative neurologic toxicity profiles of chemotherapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Acute neurological dysfunction in critically ill patients with solid tumors: A 14-year retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Eculizumab as rescue therapy for relapse of myasthenia gravis after immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Zain FarooqDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Sheeba Ba AqeelRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Prasanth LingamaneniDepartment of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr, Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois.
Rayli Carolina PichardoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Aleeza JawedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saad KhalidDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shristi Upadhyay BanskotaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ankit ManglaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Case Western Reserve University · USDow University of Health Sciences · PKHenry Ford Health System · USJohn H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity School · USZiauddin University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Neurologic adverse events (NAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be fatal but are underexplored. Objective: To compare NAEs reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICIs with other forms of chemotherapy and placebo. Data Sources: Bibliographic databases (Embase, Ovid, MEDLINE, and Scopus data) and trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception through March 1, 2020. Study Selection: Phase II/III RCTs evaluating the use of ICIs were eligible for inclusion. Unpublished trials were excluded from the analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two investigators independently performed screening of trials using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. NAEs were recorded for each arm. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk of NAEs with ICI use compared with any drug regimen, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and placebo. Results: A total 39 trials including 23 705 patients were analyzed (16 135 [68.0%] men, 7866 [33.1%] White). The overall risk of a NAE was lower in the ICI group (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77) and in the subgroup of RCTs comparing ICI use with chemotherapy (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.39). In the subgroup of RCTs comparing ICI with placebo, the overall risk of NAE was significantly higher in the ICI group (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.30-1.89). Peripheral neuropathy (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.51) and dysgeusia (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) were significantly lower in the ICI group. Headache was more common with the use of ICIs (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59). In the subgroup analysis of RCTs comparing ICI use with chemotherapy, peripheral neuropathy (RR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.17), dysgeusia (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85), and paresthesia (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.67) were significantly lower in the ICI group. RCTs comparing ICIs with placebo showed a higher risk of headache with ICI use (RR, 1.63; 95%, CI, 1.32-2.02). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this meta-analysis suggest that the overall risk of NAEs, peripheral neuropathy, and dysgeusia is lower with the use of ICI. When compared with chemotherapy, the overall risk of NAE, peripheral neuropathy, paresthesia, and dysgeusia was lower with ICI use; however, when compared with placebo, the risk of NAEs is higher with the use of ICI.

Indexed as

DysgeusiaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleParesthesiaUnited StatesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35438755
PMCPMC9020216
OpenAlexW4224255007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.