Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35438321›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

KRAS mutation as a predictor of insufficient trastuzumab efficacy and poor prognosis in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Keitaro Shimozaki, Eiji Shinozaki, Noriko Yamamoto, Yu Imamura, Hiroki Osumi, Izuma Nakayama, Takeru Wakatsuki, Akira Ooki, Daisuke Takahari, Mariko Ogura and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical impact of intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity on trastuzumab deruxtecan efficacy in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keitaro ShimozakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-5699
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan. eiji.shinozaki@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-5894
Noriko YamamotoDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu ImamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki OsumiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeru WakatsukiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira OokiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke TakahariDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko OguraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisho ChinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake 3-8-3, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKeio University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough RAS and PIK3CA mutations have been associated with resistance to anti-EGFR antibody in colorectal cancer or trastuzumab in breast cancer, their implications for trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between trastuzumab efficacy and mutation status in the HER family signaling pathway.

methodsThis study retrospectively evaluated patients with HER2-positive AGC who received first-line trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy between March 2011 and November 2015. Multiplex genotyping, including KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF, was then performed using the Luminex Assay, after which KRAS amplification was measured using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thereafter, the association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

resultsKRAS mutation (MT) was detected in 6 of 77 patients (7.8%), whereas KRAS amplification was found in 15 of 67 patients (22%). No mutations in NRAS, PIK3CA, or BRAF were identified. The KRAS MT group showed significantly worse response rates (16.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.016), progression-free survival [median, 4.8 vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio (HR), 3.95; 95% CI, 1.60-9.76; P = 0.0029], and overall survival (11.5 vs. 23.6 months; HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56-9.28; P = 0.033) compared to the KRAS wild-type group. KRAS amplification had no effect on clinical outcomes.

conclusionKRAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival and might predict insufficient trastuzumab efficacy, whereas KRAS amplification showed no prognostic significance during trastuzumab treatment. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the predictive value of KRAS status in HER2-positive AGC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesHumansPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesTrastuzumabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesKRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TrastuzumabGastric cancerHER2KRAS amplificationKRAS mutationTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID35438321
PMCPMC11797630
OpenAlexW4224213618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.