Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35438307›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

The winking sign is an indicator for increased femorotibial rotation in patients with recurrent patellar instability.

Andreas Flury, Sandro Hodel, Julian Hasler, Esfandiari Hooman, Sandro F Fucentese, Lazaros Vlachopoulos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging Evaluation of the Patellofemoral Joint.Video journal of sports medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas Flury *Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. andreas.flury@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-8101
Sandro Hodel *Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julian HaslerDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Esfandiari HoomanResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science (ROCS), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandro F FucenteseDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lazaros VlachopoulosDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRotation of the tibia relative to the femur was recently identified as a contributing risk factor for patellar instability, and correlated with its severity. The hypothesis was that in patellofemoral dysplastic knees, an increase in femorotibial rotation can be reliably detected on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs by an overlap of the lateral femoral condyle over the lateral tibial eminence.

methodsSixty patients (77 knees) received low-dose computed tomography (CT) of the lower extremity for assessment of torsional malalignment due to recurrent patellofemoral instability. Three-dimensional (3D) surface models were created to assess femorotibial rotation and its relationship to other morphologic risk factors of patellofemoral instability. On weight-bearing AP knee radiographs, a femoral condyle/lateral tibial eminence superimposition was defined as a positive winking sign. Using digitally reconstructed radiographs of the 3D models, susceptibility of the winking sign to vertical/horizontal AP knee radiograph malrotation was investigated.

resultsA positive winking sign was present in 30/77 knees (39.0%) and indicated a 6.3 ± 1.4° increase in femorotibial rotation (p < 0.001). Femoral condyle/tibial eminence superimposition of 1.9 mm detected an increased femorotibial rotation (> 15°) with 43% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC = 0.72; p = 0.002). A positive winking sign (with 2 mm overlap) disappeared in case of a 10° horizontally or 15° vertically malrotated radiograph, whereas a 4 mm overlap did not disappear at all, regardless of the quality of the radiograph. In absence of a winking sign, on the other hand, no superimposition resulted within 20° of vertical/horizontal image malrotation. Femorotibial rotation was positively correlated to TT-TG (R

conclusionsThe winking sign reliably indicates an increased femorotibial rotation on a weight-bearing AP knee radiograph and could prove useful for day-by-day clinical work. Future research needs to investigate whether femorotibial rotation is not only a prognostic factor but a potential surgical target in patients with patellofemoral disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityPatellofemoral JointBlinkingFemurHumansKnee JointPatellaTibiaFemorotibial rotationKnee rotationPatellar instabilityWinking sign

Identifiers

PMID35438307
PMCPMC9568440
OpenAlexW4224281174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.