Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35438250›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Countries' experiences scaling up national breastfeeding, protection, promotion and support programmes: Comparative case studies analysis.

Sonia Hernández-Cordero, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Paul Zambrano, Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau, Vania Lara-Mejía, Bianca Franco-Lares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration Among Primiparous Black Women.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonia Hernández-CorderoInstituto de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo con Equidad (EQUIDE), Universidad Iberoamericana, México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-0962
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-8039
Paul ZambranoAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia/FHI 360, Manila, Philippines.
Isabelle Michaud-LétourneauDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2969-2779
Vania Lara-MejíaInstituto de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo con Equidad (EQUIDE), Universidad Iberoamericana, México City, Mexico.
Bianca Franco-LaresInstituto de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo con Equidad (EQUIDE), Universidad Iberoamericana, México City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaling up effective interventions, policies and programmes can improve breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. Furthermore, considerable interest exists in learning from relatively recent successful efforts that can inform further scaling up, with appropriate adaptations, across countries. The purpose of this four-country case studies analysis was to examine why and how improvements in BF practices occurred across four contrasting countries; Burkina Faso, the Philippines, Mexico and the United States of America. Literature reviews and key informant interviews were conducted to document BF trends over time, in addition to why and how BF protection, promotion and support policies and programmes were implemented at a national level. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. The 'Breastfeeding Gear Model' and RE-AIM (Reach; Effectiveness; Adoption; Implementation; and Maintenance) frameworks were used to understand and map the factors facilitating or hindering the scale up of the national programmes and corresponding improvements in BF practices. Each of the studied countries had different processes and timing to implement and scale up programmes to promote, protect and support breastfeeding. However, in all four countries, evidence-based advocacy, multisectoral political will, financing, research and evaluation, and coordination were key to fostering an enabling environment for BF. Furthermore, in all countries, lack of adequate maternity protection and the aggressive marketing of the breast-milk substitutes industry remains a strong source of negative feedback loops that are undermining investments in BF programmes. Country-specific best practices included innovative legislative measures (Philippines), monitoring and evaluation systems (United States of America), engagement of civil society (Mexico) and behavior change communication BF promotion (Burkina Faso) initiatives. There is an urgent need to improve maternity protection and to strongly enforce the WHO Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMilk SubstitutesFemaleHealth PromotionHealth ServicesHumansMarketingMilk, HumanPregnancybreastfeedingbreastfeeding promotionbreastfeeding supportbreast-milk substitutespolicypolicy making

Identifiers

PMID35438250
PMCPMC9113475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.