ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022
Biological and Molecular Factors Predicting Response to Adoptive Cell Therapies in Cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Therapeutic Targets: Deciphering Interaction Networks and Advancing Clinical Translation.MedComm · 2026Review
- Label-free estimation of regulatory T cell activation markers using Raman spectroscopy with machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of PAX9 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Current molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies to reveal and overcome T-cell dysfunction in gastric cancer: translation from basic research to clinical application.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Titrating chimeric antigen receptors on CAR T cells enabled by a microfluidic-based dosage-controlled intracellular mRNA delivery platform.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- A new era of cancer immunotherapy: combining revolutionary technologies for enhanced CAR-M therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Exploring the Molecular Mechanisms and Shared Gene Signatures Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Microfluidics enabled multi-omics triple-shot mass spectrometry for cell-based therapies.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- Culture expansion of CAR T cells results in aberrant DNA methylation that is associated with adverse clinical outcome.Leukemia · 2023Article
- Machine learning in metastatic cancer research: Potentials, possibilities, and prospects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Opportunities and obstacles for the melanoma immunotherapy using T cell and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) applications: a literature review.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Conjugation of Hypericin to Gold Nanoparticles for Enhancement of Photodynamic Therapy in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) constitutes a major breakthrough in cancer management that has expanded in the past years due to impressive results showing durable and even curative responses for some patients with hematological malignancies. ACT leverages antigen specificity and cytotoxic mechanisms of the immune system, particularly relying on the patient's T lymphocytes to target and eliminate malignant cells. This personalized therapeutic approach exemplifies the success of the joint effort of basic, translational, and clinical researchers that has turned the patient's immune system into a great ally in the search for a cancer cure. ACTs are constantly improving to reach a maximum beneficial clinical response. Despite being very promising therapeutic options for certain types of cancers, mainly melanoma and hematological malignancies, these individualized treatments still present several shortcomings, including elevated costs, technical challenges, management of adverse side effects, and a limited population of responder patients. Thus, it is crucial to discover and develop reliable and robust biomarkers to specifically and sensitively pinpoint the patients that will benefit the most from ACT as well as those at higher risk of developing potentially serious toxicities. Although unique readouts of infused cell therapy success have not yet been identified, certain characteristics from the adoptive cells, the tumor, and/or the tumor microenvironment have been recognized to predict patients' outcome on ACT. Here, we comment on the importance of biomarkers to predict ACT chances of success to maximize efficacy of treatments and increase patients' survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.