ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022
A quality control portal for sequencing data deposited at the European genome-phenome archive.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology.MedComm · 2025Review
- Aberrant spliceosome activity via elevated intron retention and upregulation and phosphorylation of SF3B1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its launch in 2008, the European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGA) has been leading the archiving and distribution of human identifiable genomic data. In this regard, one of the community concerns is the potential usability of the stored data, as of now, data submitters are not mandated to perform any quality control (QC) before uploading their data and associated metadata information. Here, we present a new File QC Portal developed at EGA, along with QC reports performed and created for 1 694 442 files [Fastq, sequence alignment map (SAM)/binary alignment map (BAM)/CRAM and variant call format (VCF)] submitted at EGA. QC reports allow anonymous EGA users to view summary-level information regarding the files within a specific dataset, such as quality of reads, alignment quality, number and type of variants and other features. Researchers benefit from being able to assess the quality of data prior to the data access decision and thereby, increasing the reusability of data (https://ega-archive.org/blog/data-upcycling-powered-by-ega/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.