Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437960›Full record

SynthesisInvestigative and clinical urology2022

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transurethral laser versus open prostatectomy for patients with large-sized benign prostatic hyperplasia: A meta-analysis of comparative trials.

Hai-Bin Wei, Bing-Yi Guo, Yao-Fen Tu, Xuan-Han Hu, Wei Zheng, Da-Hong Zhang, Jian Zhuo

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Bin Wei *Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1116-5180
Bing-Yi Guo *Medical College, Qingdao University, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-1251
Yao-Fen TuUrology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-6820
Xuan-Han HuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2019-0799
Wei ZhengUrology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-9924
Da-Hong ZhangUrology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China. zhangdahong88@yeah.net.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-8239
Jian ZhuoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. zhuojian2001@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-315X
Hangzhou Medical College · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province 2018KY019Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province 2021KY449National Science Foundation of China 81400755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe selection of open prostatectomy (OP) over transurethral laser surgery is controversial for large volume prostates. Thus, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of transurethral laser versus OP, and provide the latest evidence of clinical practice for large-sized benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis meta-analysis used Review Manager V5.3 software and the systematic literature search of Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science datasets was performed for citations published from 2000 to 2020 that compared transurethral laser with OP for the treatment of large BPH. Variables of interest assessing the two techniques included clinical characteristics, and the perioperation-, effectiveness-, and complication-related outcomes.

resultsThe meta-analysis included twelve studies containing 1,514 patients, with 792 laser and 722 OP. The transurethral laser group was associated with shorter hospital stay and catheterization duration, and less hemoglobin decreased in the perioperative variables. There was no significant difference in the international prostate symptom score, post-void residual urine volume, maximum flow rate, and quality of life score. Transurethral laser group had a significantly lower incidence of blood transfusion than OP group (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.19; p<0.001; I²=8%), and no statistical differences were found with respect to the other complications.

conclusionsBoth OP and transurethral laser prostatectomy are effective and safe treatments for large prostate adenomas. With these advantages of less blood loss and transfusion, and shorter catheterization time and hospital stay, laser may be a better choice for large BPH.

Indexed as

Prostatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateHumansLasersMaleProstatectomyQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeLaser therapyMeta-analysisProstatectomyProstatic hyperplasiaTransurethral resection of prostate

Identifiers

PMID35437960
PMCPMC9091835
OpenAlexW4224272506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.