Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437824›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating.

Paris Veltsos, Damiano Porcelli, Yongxiang Fang, Andrew R Cossins, Michael G Ritchie, Rhonda R Snook

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexual selection purges mutation load, but not overall genetic diversity, decreasing vulnerability to extinction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Paris VeltsosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Damiano PorcelliDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Yongxiang FangCGR, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew R CossinsCentre for Genomic Research, Institute for Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Rhonda R SnookDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1852-1448
University of Liverpool · GBStockholm University · SEUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post copulatory interactions between the sexes in internally fertilizing species elicits both sexual conflict and sexual selection. Macroevolutionary and comparative studies have linked these processes to rapid transcriptomic evolution in sex-specific tissues and substantial transcriptomic post mating responses in females, patterns of which are altered when mating between reproductively isolated species. Here, we tested multiple predictions arising from sexual selection and conflict theory about the evolution of sex-specific and tissue-specific gene expression and the post mating response at the microevolutionary level. Following over 150 generations of experimental evolution under either reduced (enforced monogamy) or elevated (polyandry) sexual selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura, we found a substantial effect of sexual selection treatment on transcriptomic divergence in virgin male and female reproductive tissues (testes, male accessory glands, the female reproductive tract and ovaries). Sexual selection treatment also had a dominant effect on the post mating response, particularly in the female reproductive tract - the main arena for sexual conflict - compared to ovaries. This effect was asymmetric with monandry females typically showing more post mating responses than polyandry females, with enriched gene functions varying across treatments. The evolutionary history of the male partner had a larger effect on the post mating response of monandry females, but females from both sexual selection treatments showed unique patterns of gene expression and gene function when mating with males from the alternate treatment. Our microevolutionary results mostly confirm comparative macroevolutionary predictions on the role of sexual selection on transcriptomic divergence and altered gene regulation arising from divergent coevolutionary trajectories between sexual selection treatments.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalSexual SelectionAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophilaFemaleMaleReproductionTranscriptomeejaculate-female interactionsexperimental evolutionfemale post mating responsereproductionreproductive isolationsexual conflictSfps

Identifiers

PMID35437824
PMCPMC9325514
OpenAlexW4224226443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.