Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437708›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2022

Radiation Dose Aspects of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Uveal Melanoma Patients with Liver Metastases.

Sebastian Zensen, Marcel K Opitz, Johannes M Ludwig, Johannes Haubold, Heike Richly, Jens T Siveke, Jens M Theysohn, Michael Forsting, Denise Bos, Benedikt M Schaarschmidt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian ZensenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. sebastian.zensen@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-0740
Marcel K OpitzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Johannes M LudwigInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Johannes HauboldInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Heike RichlyDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jens T SivekeBridge Institute of Experimental Tumor Therapy, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jens M TheysohnInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Denise BosInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Benedikt M SchaarschmidtInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn uveal melanoma patients, liver metastases can be treated by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). During this procedure, melphalan or, less frequently, fotemustine is infused into the hepatic artery or the hepatic lobe arteries in regularly repeated interventions to achieve local tumor control. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure of HAIC. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, dose data from 841 procedures in 140 patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 74 female) who underwent HAIC between 06/2017 and 10/2021 at one of three different angiography systems were analyzed.

resultsIn the overall population, dose area product (DAP) (median (IQR)) was 1773 cGy·cm

conclusionIn uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases undergoing HAIC, radiation exposure is significantly higher both at the first intervention compared to follow-up interventions, but also with increasing number of infusion positions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsUveal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHepatic ArteryHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialMelanomaMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesUveal Melanoma

Identifiers

PMID35437708
PMCPMC9117360
OpenAlexW4224243310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.