Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437633›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Qualitative Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Nebraska.

Kendra L Ratnapradipa, Krishtee Napit, Jordan Ranta, Lady Beverly Luma, Danae Dinkel, Tamara Robinson, Laura Schabloske, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kendra L RatnapradipaDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), NSW, 68198-4395, Omaha, USA. Kendra.ratnapradipa@unmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0265-2400
Krishtee NapitDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), NSW, 68198-4395, Omaha, USA.
Jordan RantaSarpy/Cass Health Department, Papillion, NE, USA.
Lady Beverly LumaOffice of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, UNMC, Omaha, NE, USA.
Danae DinkelSchool of Health & Kinesiology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Tamara RobinsonNebraska Cancer Coalition, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Laura SchabloskeNebraska Cancer Coalition, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Shinobu Watanabe-GallowayDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), NSW, 68198-4395, Omaha, USA.
Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer CenterNebraska Cancer Research Center · USNebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Apar Kishor Ganti · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to urban residents, rural populations are less likely to engage in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. As part of a statewide cancer needs assessment, we aimed to elicit rural perspectives about CRC screening and resources. We conducted three focus groups with rural Nebraska cancer survivors and caregivers (N = 20) in Spring 2021 using a collective case study design. Participant awareness of and knowledge about CRC screening methods varied across focus groups; overall, 95% of participants had heard of colonoscopy. Participants were less familiar with fecal tests and had confusion about them. Colonoscopy was associated with negative perceptions regarding the time, cost, and discomfort of the preparation and procedure, but some providers did not discuss alternative methods unless the patient resisted colonoscopy. Healthcare providers played a key role educating rural communities about CRC screening recommendations (age, risk) and testing options and being persistent in those recommendations. CRC awareness campaigns should include a variety of communication channels (TV, radio, billboards, health fairs, churches, healthcare settings). Promotion of CRC screening should include education about screening age guidelines, alternative test types, and informed decision-making between provider and patient regarding preferred screening methods based on the pros and cons of each test type. Individuals with a family history of colon issues (Crohn's disease, CRC) are considered high risk and need to be aware that screening should be discussed at earlier ages.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsRural PopulationColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningNebraskaCancer screeningColorectal cancerFocus groupQualitative analysisRural health

Identifiers

PMID35437633
PMCPMC9015281
OpenAlexW4223963224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.