Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437617›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2022

Community Mobilization Approaches for Large-Scale Public Health Surveys: Experiences from the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) Project.

Bright Phiri, Apala Guhathakurta, Connor Wright, Blanche Pitt, Reaboka Maraisane, Leonard Kingwara, Aroldia Mulokozi, Nellie Wadonda, Catherine Ngugi, Danielle Payne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bright PhiriICAP at Columbia University in South Africa (Regional Office), Pretoria, South Africa. Brightphiri68@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-4261
Apala GuhathakurtaICAP at Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Connor WrightICAP at Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Blanche PittICAP at Columbia University in South Africa (Regional Office), Pretoria, South Africa.
Reaboka MaraisaneICAP at Columbia University in Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho.
Leonard KingwaraNASCOP Kenya, Surveillance, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aroldia MulokoziTanzania MoH, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Nellie WadondaMalawi CDC Country Office, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Catherine NgugiNASCOP Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Danielle PayneMalawi CDC Country Office, Lilongwe, Malawi.
ICAP Global HealthUniversity of South Africa · ZAKenya School of Government · KENational University of Lesotho · LS

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community mobilization is an integral process of raising awareness and increasing participation in a specific program. Communities with long-standing mistrust of health research may otherwise be reluctant to participate in surveys originating outside of their locality, particularly when asked to share personal information, provide blood samples, or undergo medical examinations. Here we discuss the community mobilization approaches undertaken by the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) project to optimize participation in surveys across 13 countries of sub-Saharan Africa. The PHIA Project developed a community mobilization strategy to address anticipated community concerns. In each country, a trained cadre of Community Mobilization Coordinators (CMCs) facilitated (1) ongoing communication with leadership and stakeholders at national, provincial/district and local levels; (2) door-to-door visits and group meetings; (3) promotional material dissemination through radio and television jingles and mass social/community media; and (4) the use of public address systems to enhance survey awareness and promote participation. Response rates (RR) were recorded from each survey. The PHIA surveys' mobilization efforts cultivated a receptive environment for data collection. The average household response rate for 13 PHIA surveys was 90.4% and interview RR were consistently over 80%, with women more likely to conduct an interview in all countries except Cote d'Ivoire. 89% of eligible women consented to a blood draw and 81.1% of eligible men consented. The robust and contextualized community mobilization approaches in PHIA were critical for engaging communities in large-scale public health surveys and contributed to high RR in participant interviews and blood draw.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPublic HealthAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumansMaleMass MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity mobilizationHIV/AIDSPHIAPopulation-based surveys

Identifiers

PMID35437617
OpenAlexW4224237521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.