Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437478›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and technology2022

COVID-19 in Finland: Vaccination strategy as part of the wider governing of the pandemic.

Hanna Tiirinki, Marjaana Viita-Aho, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen, Markus Sovala, Vesa Jormanainen, Ilmo Keskimäki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05479383 (Tobacco Use and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccinations in Finland), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05479383 unknown statusnot on this map

Tobacco Use and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccinations in Finland: a General Population Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFinnish Institute for Health and WelfareRan2017 to 2023Enrolled42,935ConditionsCOVID-19, Smoking, Tobacco Use, Vaccination RefusalArmsNot applicable, this is an observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 impacts in Northernmost Finland.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna TiirinkiDepartment of Social Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Turku, Finland.
Marjaana Viita-AhoHealth Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Liina-Kaisa TynkkynenHealth Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Markus SovalaStatistics Finland.
Vesa JormanainenWelfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Ilmo KeskimäkiHealth Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Tampere University · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIStatistics Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the vaccination strategy as part of wider public governing of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. Methods: The study provides a synthesis of vaccination strategy and health policy measures, as well as economic challenges, in the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. The analysis is based on the systematic collection and reviewing of documents and reports. The review was complemented with relevant pandemic and vaccination monitoring data from Finland. Results: The vaccination strategy approved by the Finnish Government in December 2020 prioritised various risk groups and health and social care professionals attending to COVID-19 patients. The Government has purchased COVID-19 vaccines through the EU joint procurement programme. Vaccinations were organised by municipalities and offered free of charge. The Government recommends universal vaccinations, including foreign residents and undocumented migrants. In 2021, the Government adopted a revised COVID-19 hybrid strategy, which aimed to dismantle wide restrictions as a means to control the epidemic. Despite high vaccination coverage, the Omicron variant became widespread in the population. The economic consequences of the pandemic have been less severe than expected. Conclusions: In the approach to manage the pandemic, the vaccination strategy has a central role. Finland has probably benefitted from the EU joint vaccine procurement programme. The rapid launch of the vaccinations was supported by the existing vaccination capacity in municipalities. High vaccine coverage was seen as a key in opening society. Although a relatively high vaccination rate was not able to stop the spread of Omicron in late 2021, it has efficiently curbed serious cases and kept the death rate low.

Indexed as

COVID-19EconomyFinlandHealth careVaccination strategy

Identifiers

PMID35437478
PMCPMC9008981
OpenAlexW4223927572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.