Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437475›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Determination of exercise intensity domains during upright versus supine cycling: a methodological study.

Damir Zubac, Vladimir Ivančev, Vincent Martin, Antonio Dello Iacono, Cécil J W Meulenberg, Adam C McDonnell

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damir ZubacKinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4204-4207
Vladimir IvančevKinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Vincent MartinAME2P, Université d'Auvergne (Clermont-Ferrand I), Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6681-1610
Antonio Dello IaconoInstitute for Clinical Exercise and Health Science, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-0957
Cécil J W MeulenbergInstitute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Center Koper, Koper, Slovenia.
Adam C McDonnellDepartment of Automation, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a growing interest among the research community and clinical practitioners to investigate cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) procedures and protocols utilized in supine cycling. Materials and Methods: The current study investigated the effects of posture on indicators of exercise intensity including gas exchange threshold (GET), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and the rate of peak oxygen uptake (V̇O Results: No differences were observed in the V̇O Conclusion: Since an accurate identification of an appropriate power output (PO) from a single-visit CPET remains a matter of debate, especially for supine cycling, we propose that moderate-intensity step-transitions preceding a ramp CPET could be a viable addition to ensure appropriate exercise-intensity domain determination, in particular upon GET-based prescription.

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionPostureAdultBicyclingExercise TestHumansMaleStanding PositionYoung AdultConstant load exerciseCritical powerMetabolic flexibilitySkeletal muscle oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID35437475
PMCPMC9013233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.