Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
1 author.
Mukhamed Kh KarmokovTembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain territories RAS, I. Armand str., 37a, Nalchik 360051, Russia Tembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain territories RAS Nalchik Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3797-2511
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
1.288–0.307 Mya. The possible relationship between the climate changes in the Pliocene and the origin of the Ch.plumosus group are discussed. Chironomidae1758) sequences from European populations1803. The karyotype of the studied population is monomorphic. The morphological and chromosomal characteristics of Ch.bonus from the Caucasus are similar to those previously described for this species (Kiknadze et al. 1991a). In the phylogenetic tree based on the COI gene sequences1974 (Diptera3–23–53 Mya) and early Pliocene (558 Mya). On the other handand do not form a separate clade of the phylogenetic tree. One can suppose that the origin of the Ch.plumosus group of sibling species dates back to 5.75–3.43 million years ago (Mya)and Nearctic Ch.entis-Ch.plumosus clusters appeared relatively recently in the Middle Pleistoceneand Nearctic Ch.entis-Ch.plumosus clusters. The calculated K2P genetic distances within each cluster have not exceeded the 3% threshold for the genus Chironomus. Contrary to thisChironomidae) from the South Caucasus. The species belongs to the Ch.plumosus group of sibling speciesChironomusbonusCOI geneDipteraFar Eastern Ch.borokensis-Ch.suwaimitochondrial DNAone can observe several clear clusters. We named them Palearctic Ch.plumosusone of the most widespread and successful groups in the genus Chironomus MeigenPalearctic Ch.plumosusphylogenypolytene chromosomesSouth Caucasusthe distances between the clusters exceed this range and correspond to separate species. The Ch.bonus sequences belong to the cluster consisting of Ch.plumosus (Linnaeusthe epochs of Late Miocene (7The study presents data on the karyotype characteristics and the mitochondrial gene COI sequences of the non-biting midge Chironomusbonus Shilova et sDzhvarsheishvili
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Karyotype characteristics and gene COI sequences of · full record | OpenQuestion