Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437357›Full record

ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2022

Application of Automated External Defibrillators in Motorcycle Ambulances in Thailand's Emergency Medical Services.

Korakot Apiratwarakul, Somsak Tiamkao, Lap Woon Cheung, Ismet Celebi, Takaaki Suzuki, Kamonwon Ienghong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Korakot ApiratwarakulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-0865
Somsak TiamkaoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-478X
Lap Woon CheungDepartment of Accident and Emergency, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Ismet CelebiDepartment of Paramedic, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Takaaki SuzukiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kamonwon IenghongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-4128
Khon Kaen University · THGazi University · TRUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access time to emergency patients is a critical factor that affects the outcomes of life-or-death situations, especially in the cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). This study focused on developing a new model of emergency medical services (EMS) using a motorcycle-based ambulance (motorlance) with an automated external defibrillator (AED). There are currently no studies regarding access time for this vehicle. This study aimed at utilization of an AED in conjunction with motorlance and comparing the response time between a traditional ambulance and a motorlance. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the EMS department of Srinagarind Hospital, located in Khon Kaen, Thailand, over a five-month period, from September 2021 to January 2022. Data were recorded employing a national standard of operations record form used for Thailand EMS departments nationwide. Results: The 891 cases were divided into two groups which were motorlance and ambulance. The activation times for motorlance and ambulance were 0.44 minutes and 1.42 minutes, respectively (p < 0.001) and the response time in the motorlance group was 7.20 minutes compared with 9.25 minutes in the ambulance group. In OHCA, the motorlance with AED arrived at patients location and assisted to continue resuscitation at the hospital 88.9% of the time. Conclusion: AED used in conjunction with motorcycle ambulances had shorter periods of both activation time and response time compared to ambulances. The use of AEDs clearly increases the number of continuous resuscitations in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Indexed as

ambulancecardiac arrestemergency careprehospital emergency careresponse time

Identifiers

PMID35437357
PMCPMC9013265
OpenAlexW4223626375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.