Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437308›Full record

ArticleOncogene2022

Loss of E-cadherin leads to Id2-dependent inhibition of cell cycle progression in metastatic lobular breast cancer.

Max A K Rätze, Thijs Koorman, Thijmen Sijnesael, Blessing Bassey-Archibong, Robert van de Ven, Lotte Enserink, Daan Visser, Sridevi Jaksani, Ignacio Viciano, Elvira R M Bakker and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell-Cell Adhesion and Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Max A K Rätze *Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thijs Koorman *Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-3353
Thijmen SijnesaelDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-9786
Blessing Bassey-ArchibongDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Robert van de VenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lotte EnserinkDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daan VisserDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-8745
Sridevi JaksaniDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ignacio VicianoInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), the Barcelona Institute of Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Elvira R M BakkerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3156-3725
François RichardLaboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4353-3619
Andrew TuttThe Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-2901
Lynda O'LearyBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda FitzpatrickBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Pere Roca-CusachsInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), the Barcelona Institute of Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-961X
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christine DesmedtLaboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-5579
Juliet M DanielDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Clare M IsackeBreast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-3345
Patrick W B DerksenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.w.b.derksen@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0732-7762

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is characterized by proliferative indolence and long-term latency relapses. This study aimed to identify how disseminating ILC cells control the balance between quiescence and cell cycle re-entry. In the absence of anchorage, ILC cells undergo a sustained cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 while maintaining viability. From the genes that are upregulated in anchorage independent ILC cells, we selected Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2), a mediator of cell cycle progression. Using loss-of-function experiments, we demonstrate that Id2 is essential for anchorage independent survival (anoikis resistance) in vitro and lung colonization in mice. Importantly, we find that under anchorage independent conditions, E-cadherin loss promotes expression of Id2 in multiple mouse and (organotypic) human models of ILC, an event that is caused by a direct p120-catenin/Kaiso-dependent transcriptional de-repression of the canonical Kaiso binding sequence TCCTGCNA. Conversely, stable inducible restoration of E-cadherin expression in the ILC cell line SUM44PE inhibits Id2 expression and anoikis resistance. We show evidence that Id2 accumulates in the cytosol, where it induces a sustained and CDK4/6-dependent G0/G1 cell cycle arrest through interaction with hypo-phosphorylated Rb. Finally, we find that Id2 is indeed enriched in ILC when compared to other breast cancers, and confirm cytosolic Id2 protein expression in primary ILC samples. In sum, we have linked mutational inactivation of E-cadherin to direct inhibition of cell cycle progression. Our work indicates that loss of E-cadherin and subsequent expression of Id2 drive indolence and dissemination of ILC. As such, E-cadherin and Id2 are promising candidates to stratify low and intermediate grade invasive breast cancers for the use of clinical cell cycle intervention drugs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularAnimalsCadherinsCell CycleFemaleHumansInhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2MiceNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCadherinsID2 protein, humanInhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID35437308
PMCPMC9122823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.