Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35437275›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Anterior Cingulate Cortex Signals the Need to Control Intrusive Thoughts during Motivated Forgetting.

Maité Crespo-García, Yulin Wang, Mojun Jiang, Michael C Anderson, Xu Lei

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medial Prefrontal Cortex Stimulation Reduces Retrieval-Induced Forgetting via Fronto-parietal Beta Desynchronization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sensing, feeling and regulating: investigating the association of focal brain damage with voluntary respiratory and motor control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maité Crespo-GarcíaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
Yulin WangSleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, People's Republic of China.
Mojun JiangSleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, People's Republic of China.
Michael C AndersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom xlei@swu.edu.cn michael.anderson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Xu LeiSleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, People's Republic of China xlei@swu.edu.cn michael.anderson@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Southwest University · CNMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do people limit awareness of unwanted memories? When such memories intrude, a control process engages the right DLPFC (rDLPFC) to inhibit hippocampal activity and stop retrieval. It remains unknown how the need for control is detected, and whether control operates proactively to prevent unwelcome memories from being retrieved, or responds reactively, to counteract intrusions. We hypothesized that dorsal ACC (dACC) detects the emergence of an unwanted trace in awareness and transmits the need for inhibitory control to rDLPFC. During a memory suppression task, we measured in humans (both sexes) trial-by-trial variations in the theta power and N2 amplitude of dACC, two EEG markers that are thought to reflect the need for control. With simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings, we tracked interactions among dACC, rDLPFC, and hippocampus during suppression. We found a clear role of dACC in detecting the need for memory control and upregulating prefrontal inhibition. Importantly, we identified distinct early (300-450 ms) and late (500-700 ms) dACC contributions, suggesting both proactive control before recollection and reactive control in response to intrusions. Stronger early activity was associated with reduced hippocampal activity and diminished BOLD signal in dACC and rDLPFC, suggesting that preempting retrieval reduced overall control demands. In the later window, dACC activity was larger, and effective connectivity analyses revealed robust communication from dACC to rDLPFC and from rDLPFC to hippocampus, which are tied to successful forgetting. Together, our findings support a model in which dACC detects the emergence of unwanted content, triggering top-down inhibitory control, and in which rDLPFC countermands intruding thoughts that penetrate awareness.

Indexed as

Gyrus CinguliMental RecallFemaleHippocampusHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal Cortexanterior cingulate cortexdorsolateral prefrontal cortexinhibitory controlintrusive thoughtsmemory suppressionmotivated forgetting

Identifiers

PMID35437275
PMCPMC9145231
OpenAlexW4226128126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.